Suppose $A\in R^{n\times n}$ and $B\in R^{m\times m}$ are symmetric positive definite matrices. Is the following set convex and compact?
$\mathcal{S}^{+}=\left\{C\in R^{n\times m}\Big|\begin{bmatrix}A&C\\C^T&B\end{bmatrix}>0\right\}$
How about the following set:
$\mathcal{S}=\left\{C\in R^{n\times m}\Big|\begin{bmatrix}A&C\\C^T&B\end{bmatrix}\geq 0\right\}$
Is $\mathcal{S}$ homeomorphic to a closed ball in $\mathbb{R}^{p}$ for an arbitrary norm, where $p=n\times m$.
As mentioned by Eric Brown, there is another way to prove the boundedness of $\mathcal S$ and $\mathcal S^+$.
The original large matrix is symmetric positive (semi-)definite iff $$\begin{bmatrix}A^{-\frac12} & 0 \\ 0 & B^{-\frac12}\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}A & C \\ C^T & B\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}A^{-\frac12} & 0 \\ 0 & B^{-\frac12}\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}I & P:=A^{-\frac12}CB^{-\frac12} \\ P^T=B^{-\frac12}CA^{-\frac12} & I\end{bmatrix}$$ is also iff its Schur complement $F:=I-P^TP\succ(\succeq)0$. Diagonalization leads to the spectral norm of $\|P\|<(\le)1$. This is actually a generalization and stronger version of the enry-wise inequality derived in my previous answer $A_{i,i}^{-1}C_{i,j}^2B_{j,j}^{-1}<(\le)1$. As a corollary, the diagonal entries of $F$ should be positive (nonnegative), thus each column 2-norm of $P$ or $\sqrt{\sum_jP_{i,j}^2}<(\le)1$, so is each individual entry $P_{i,j}$ of $P$.
$\mathcal S$ is closed, so it is compact. $\mathcal S^+$ is not closed as $C$ can reduce the rank of the original large matrix by continuously changing it value, so it is not compact.