The problem and solution is presented as above, but it doesn't seem that the proof is complete. Could someone show in details why the last step implies that $\int f \, d\mu = \lim \int f_n \, d\mu$ please? Thanks.
2026-05-03 18:27:28.1777832848
Completing the proof that $\int f \, d\mu= \lim \int f_n \, d\mu$
167 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in LEBESGUE-INTEGRAL
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- Square Integrable Functions are Measurable?
- Lebesgue measure and limit of the integral.
- Solving an integral by using the Dominated Convergence Theorem.
- Convergence of a seqence under the integral sign
- If $g \in L^1$ and $f_n \to f$ a.e. where $|f_n| \leq 1$, then $g*f_n \to g*f$ uniformly on each compact set.
- Integral with Dirac measure.
- If $u \in \mathscr{L}^1(\lambda^n), v\in \mathscr{L}^\infty (\lambda^n)$, then $u \star v$ is bounded and continuous.
- Proof that $x \mapsto \int |u(x+y)-u(y)|^p \lambda^n(dy)$ is continuous
- a) Compute $T(1_{[\alpha,\beta]})$ for all $0<\alpha <\beta<0$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?


You are rigt. The proof is incomplete. Here is one way to complete it.
Completing the proof: (remember that $n$ is fixed). We know then $$\int f d\mu \geq \int \varphi d\mu -\epsilon \mu(X)$$ for any simple function $\varphi \leq f_n$. Since $$\int f_n d\mu = \sup \left \{ \int \varphi d\mu \:|\: 0 \leq \varphi \leq f_n \right \}$$ We can conclude $$\int f d\mu \geq \int f_n d\mu -\epsilon \mu(X)$$
Now note that in the argument using $\varphi$ and $\psi$ the functions $f_n$ and $f$ play a completely symmentric role. So, reversing their roles, we can start peeking a simple function $\varphi \leq f$ and we can conclude $$\int f_n d\mu \geq \int f d\mu -\epsilon \mu(X)$$
So we have, since $X$ has finite measure, $$\left |\int f_n d\mu - \int f d\mu \right | \leq \epsilon \mu(X)$$
So for any $\epsilon>0$, there is a $N$ such that if $n\geq N$, we have $|f_n(x)-f(x)|<\epsilon$ for all $x\in X$, and we also have, as we proved, $\left |\int f_n d\mu - \int f d\mu \right | \leq \epsilon \mu(X)$. So $$\int f d\mu = \lim_{n\to\infty} \int f_n d\mu.$$
Remark: There are simple ways to prove the result. For instance:
Simpler proof: By Cor. 2.10, $f\in M$, and as $f_n\geq 0$ for all $n$, we also have $f\geq 0$, and thus $f\in M^+$. Let $\epsilon>0$, then there is a $N$ such that if $n\geq N$, we have $|f_n(x)-f(x)|<\epsilon$ for all $x\in X$, we have $$ f_n - \epsilon <f < f_n+ \epsilon$$ So, if $n\geq N$, we have $$ 0\leq f_n <f+ \epsilon < f_n+ 2\epsilon$$ and so $$ 0\leq \int f_n d\mu \leq \int f d\mu + \epsilon \mu(X) \leq \int f_n d\mu + 2\epsilon \mu(X) $$ which means, since $X$ has finite measure, that $$\left |\int f_n d\mu - \int f d\mu \right | \leq \epsilon \mu(X)$$
So for any $\epsilon>0$, there is a $N$ such that if $n\geq N$, we have $\left |\int f_n d\mu - \int f d\mu \right | \leq \epsilon \mu(X)$. So $$\int f d\mu = \lim_{n\to\infty} \int f_n d\mu.$$