I have a complex orthnormal system. \begin{align*} \phi_{k}(t)= e^{-i a t^2}e^{i k t} \end{align*} where $k\in\mathbb{Z}$ and $ a $ is a constant. How can I prove it is complete in $L^2[-\pi,\pi]$ with respect to inner product \begin{align*} \langle\phi_{n}(t),\phi_{m}(t)\rangle=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}\phi_{n}(t)\overline{\phi_{m}(t)}~dt. \end{align*} I read one proof in "An Introduction to Non Harmonic Fourier Series" by R. M. Young. He proved that for orthonormal system $e^{i k t}$, $f\in L^2[-\pi,\pi]$ \begin{align*} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi}f(t)e^{i k t}~dt=0 \end{align*} then $ f=0$ a.e. Suppose \begin{align*} g(t)=\int_{-\pi}^{t}f(u)~du \end{align*} for $t\in [-\pi,\pi]$. Integration by parts shows that \begin{align*} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi}(g(t)-c)e^{i k t}~dt=0 \end{align*} for every constant $ c$ and $n\in \mathbb{Z}$. The problem is how to integrate with my system? It involves $e^{-i at^2}$.
2026-03-28 05:00:46.1774674046
Completness of orthnormal system
69 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPLEX-ANALYSIS
- Minkowski functional of balanced domain with smooth boundary
- limit points at infinity
- conformal mapping and rational function
- orientation of circle in complex plane
- If $u+v = \frac{2 \sin 2x}{e^{2y}+e^{-2y}-2 \cos 2x}$ then find corresponding analytical function $f(z)=u+iv$
- Is there a trigonometric identity that implies the Riemann Hypothesis?
- order of zero of modular form from it's expansion at infinity
- How to get to $\frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint_C \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} \, dz =n_0-n_p$ from Cauchy's residue theorem?
- If $g(z)$ is analytic function, and $g(z)=O(|z|)$ and g(z) is never zero then show that g(z) is constant.
- Radius of convergence of Taylor series of a function of real variable
Related Questions in ORTHOGONALITY
- Functions on $\mathbb{R}^n$ commuting with orthogonal transformations
- Proving set of orthogonal vectors is linearly indpendent
- Find all vectors $v = (x,y,z)$ orthogonal to both $u_1$ and $u_2$.
- Calculus III Vector distance problem.
- Is there a matrix which is not orthogonal but only has A transpose A equal to identity?
- Number of Orthogonal vectors
- Find the dimension of a subspace and the orthogonality complement of another
- Forming an orthonormal basis with these independent vectors
- orthogonal complement - incorrect Brézis definition
- Orthogonal Projection in Inner Product
Related Questions in ORTHONORMAL
- Orthonormal basis for $L^2(\mathbb{R}^n,\mathbb{F})$
- What is $\| f \|$ where $f(x)=\sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{3^n} \langle x,e_n\rangle$
- Forming an orthonormal basis with these independent vectors
- Orthogonal Function Dirac Delta Series
- Sum of two rank $1$ matrices with some property gives rank $2$ matrix
- Zero element in an Hilbert space is orthogonal?
- Prove that $\lVert X\rVert^2 =\sum_{i,j=1}^\infty\lvert\langle u_i,Xu_j\rangle\rvert^2$.
- Is there any connection between the fact that a set of vectors are mutually orthogonal and the same set of vectors are linearly independent
- Compute the norm of a linear operator using a normal basis in an infinite Hilbert space
- If $M$ is the span of a finite orthonormal set in a Hilbert space then $M$ is closed
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Lemma: Suppose that $\{f_k\}_{k=1}^{\infty}$ is a complete orthonormal system in $L^2[-\pi,\pi]$, with respect to the usual inner product. Let $g\in L^2[-\pi,\pi]$ be a fixed element such that $g(t)\neq 0$ for all $t\in[-\pi,\pi]$. Then the system $\{gf_k\}_{k=1}^{\infty}$ is complete in $L^2[-\pi,\pi]$, that is, the only element of $L^2[-\pi,\pi]$ orthogonal to $gf_k$ for all $k$ is the zero element.
Proof. Suppose $\phi\in L^2[-\pi,\pi]$ is orthogonal to $gf_k$ for every $k$. Then $\phi\cdot g$ is orthogonal to $f_k$ for every $k$, and since $\{f_k\}$ is complete, we must have $\phi\cdot g=0$ in $L^2[-\pi,\pi]$. Therefore, $\phi\cdot g=0$ almost everywhere. Now if $\phi$ is not zero almost everywhere, then there is some subset $E\subset[-\pi,\pi]$ with positive measure such that $\phi$ is not zero on $E$, and so $\phi\cdot g$ is also non-zero on $E$, because $g$ is never zero. Subsequently, $\phi$ must be zero almost everywhere.
Now apply the lemma to $g=e^{-iat^2}$, and the result follows.