I was recently studying "The classical theory of field' by L.Landau. In the introduction the book introduced theory of relativity. (I know I should be asking such questions on physics stack exchange, but I wanted the mathematical rigor). he derived Lorentz transformations which are: $$ x'=\gamma (x+vt) $$ $$ y'=y $$ $$ z'=z $$ $$ t'=\gamma \left(t-\frac{vx}{c^2}\right) $$ For the cases where the two observes $x$, $y$ and $z$ Axis are parallel to each other and the motion is along $x$ axis only. Landau book derive Lorentz transformations with the help of components of the four vector in the hyperbolic space and arguing that the length of four vector is invariant under transformations in inertial frame. Then it says that: \begin{align} x'&=x\cosh(\psi)+ct \sinh(\psi) \\ ct'&=-x\sinh(\psi)+ct\cosh(\psi) \end{align} These transformations are only applicable for rotation of axes(of $tx$ plane). My question is how he came up to this? I want a more general approach regarding this derivation because the book just said that the formula is same as that of rotation,We only have to replace the trigonometric part by the hyperbolic part.
2026-02-23 06:18:35.1771827515
Components of a vector in Hyperbolic Geometry
39 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in SPECIAL-RELATIVITY
- What mathematical principal allows this rearrangement during simplifying
- Rocket to a ray of light
- The reason of script expression of $\lambda^\mu_{\;\;\nu}$
- Understanding the tensor notation in special/general theory of relativity
- I am currently reading Special Relativity by Woodhouse, I need help with understanding divergence of magnetic fields
- Didn't understand a step in Einstein's paper on special relativity
- Special Relativity: A showing question $c^2-v^2$ using Velocity transformations
- Form of Lorentz Transformation in 3D space
- reference for special relativity
- Valid Interpretation of Special Relativity in terms of Length Contraction of Relative Distances
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Starting with constancy of th speed of light $c$ the under a linear Lorentz boost with velocity $v$, the straight lines $$x = ct$$ of movement at speed of light remain constant as geometric lines. This is accomplished by the coordinate transformation $$ x' = \alpha x \pm \beta ct$$ $$ct' = \gamma x \pm \delta ct$$ of both coordinates $x, ct = c * t$
Then the lines $x=\pm ct$ transform to $$\frac{x'}{ct'} = \frac{\alpha ct \pm \beta ct}{\pm \gamma ct + \delta ct}= \frac{\alpha \pm \beta }{ \pm \gamma + \delta} =\pm 1 $$ yielding $$\frac{\alpha^2 - \beta ^2 }{- \gamma^2 + \delta^2} = 1 $$
So up to a common scaling factor, we can set $$\alpha = \delta =\text{cosh} u, \quad \beta =\delta=\text{sinh} u$$ because any two expressions with constant difference of two coordinates squared can be parametrized in the same way by hyperbolic functions as for the sum by parametrization of the trigonmetric function $$\text{sin}^2 \varphi + \text{cos}^2 \varphi = 1 ,-\pi\lt \varphi\le \pi , \qquad \text{cosh}^2 u - \text{sinh}^2 u = 1, -\infty \lt u \le \infty $$ and the classical velocity is the velocity of the point $$x'=0 \longrightarrow v= c *\text{tanh} u$$.
Conundrum solved: The relativistic velocity parameter $u$ is not the quotient of two coordinates $x/t$ (not a scalar quantity, not additive, limited by $\pm c$) but an uniform group parameter (uniform scalar, additive, unlimited) like the angle $\varphi$ on the unit circle. The circle is replaced by the unit hyperbolas $$ct^2 -x^2 =\pm 1$$, which are invariant curves under Lorentz transformations like the unit circle under rotations.
The classical Einstein parametrization by v in his clumsy notation is $$\cosh u = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}, \sinh u = \frac{\frac{v}{c}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}, $$ that lost its impenetrable barrier of understanding in a world of classical Newtonian trajectories $$t\to \vec x(t)$$ evolving in 3-space with an universal celestial time parameter $t$, after Minkowskis creation of the space time continuum, only, after 1909 and the proper time as world line length parameter in space-time.