Let $C$ be a quasi-category. Then $C^{\Delta^2}\to C^{\Lambda_1^2}$ is a trivial fibration and we may choose a section $s$. The map $C^{\Lambda_1^2}\xrightarrow s C^{\Delta^2} \to C^{\{0,2\}}$ defines a composition on $C$. Of course, the face map also induces a map $C^{\Delta^2}\to C^{\{0,2\}}$, so by precomposing the first map with $C^{\Delta^2}\to C^{\Lambda_1^2}$, we get two vertices of the quasi-category $\operatorname{Fun}(C^{\Delta^2},C^{\{0,2\}})$. I would like to find a natural equivalence between these two functors; i.e. an equivalence $\Delta^1\to\operatorname{Fun}(C^{\Delta^2},C^{\{0,2\}})$ connecting these two vertices. I know this can be done because it’s implicit in the proof of Lemma 2.3.4 of Land’s book. (I’m aware that the sections of $C^{\Delta^2}\to C^{\Lambda_1^2}$ assemble into a contractible Kan complex, but the face map in general doesn’t factor via $C^{\Delta^2}\to C^{\Lambda_1^2}$.)
2026-03-30 02:04:51.1774836291
Composition in quasi-categories
107 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in SIMPLICIAL-STUFF
- Homotopy type of simplicial complexes
- $\Pi_f$ for a morphism $f$ between simplicial sets
- Trouble with changing the fractions into matrix-vector from
- A fibration $p : E \rightarrow X$ is trivial iff $p$ is a homotopy equivalence
- Quillen equivalence between sSet (Joyal's model structure) and sSetCat (Bergner's one)
- The choice of cofibrant approximation is contractible
- Do Homotopy limits commute with right Quillen functors
- Necessary conditions for a Reedy fibrant diagram
- $\infty$-categories definition disambiguation
- For simplicial abelian group quotient map to the quotient chain complex is homotopy equivalence.
Related Questions in HIGHER-CATEGORY-THEORY
- Quillen equivalence between sSet (Joyal's model structure) and sSetCat (Bergner's one)
- What is an intuitive Geometrical explanation of a "sheaf?"
- $\infty$-categories definition disambiguation
- Applications of $\infty$-categories
- Simplicial categories and simplicial objectcs. HTT Remark 1.1.4.2
- $n$-categories and associahedrons.
- Weak notion of equivalence in a category
- The $2$-category of monoids
- Higher homotopy groups in terms of the fundamental groupoid
- Pseudolimits equivalent to limits
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I will write $[X, Y]$ for the exponential object $Y^X$.
As you say, for a quasicategory $C$, the inclusion $\Lambda^2_1 \hookrightarrow \Delta^2$ induces a trivial Kan fibration $p : [\Delta^2, C] \to [\Lambda^2_1, C]$. Let $s : [\Lambda^2_1, C] \to [\Delta^2, C]$ be any section of $p : [\Delta^2, C] \to [\Lambda^2_1, C]$. Let $d_1 : [\Delta^2, C] \to [\Delta^1, C]$ be the morphism induced by the coface $\delta^1 : \Delta^1 \to \Delta^2$. Your question is, are $d_1$ and $d_1 \circ s \circ p$ equivalent? The answer is yes.
It suffices to show that $\textrm{id}_{[\Delta^2, C]}$ and $s \circ p$ are equivalent. Consider the following commutative diagram, $$\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} [\Delta^2, C] \amalg [\Delta^2, C] @>{\partial h}>> [\Delta^2, C] \\ @V{\iota}VV @VV{p}V \\ [\Delta^2, C] \times I @>>{p \circ \pi_1}> [\Lambda^2_1, C] \end{CD}$$ where $\partial h : [\Delta^2, C] \amalg [\Delta^2, C] \to [\Delta^2, C]$ is defined by $\textrm{id}_{[\Delta^2, C]}$ on one half and $s \circ p$ on the other half, $I$ is any contractible Kan complex with two points, and $\iota : [\Delta^2, C] \amalg [\Delta^2, C] \to [\Delta^2, C] \times I$ is the obvious inclusion. (The diagram does commute, because $p = p \circ s \circ p$.) Since $p : [\Delta^2, C] \to [\Lambda^2_1, C]$ is a trivial Kan fibration, it has the rlp wrt $\iota : [\Delta^2, C] \amalg [\Delta^2, C] \to [\Delta^2, C] \times I$, so we get a morphism $h : [\Delta^2, C] \times I \to [\Delta^2, C]$ such that $p \circ h = p \circ \pi_1$ and (more crucially) $h \circ \iota = \partial h$. Rearranging things, we get a morphism $I \to [[\Delta^2, C], [\Delta^2, C]]$ exhibiting an equivalence between $\textrm{id}_{[\Delta^2, C]}$ and $s \circ p$.
Actually, there was nothing special about $p : [\Delta^2, C] \to [\Lambda^2_1, C]$ needed other than the fact that it is a trivial fibration, and there was nothing special about $I$ needed other than the fact that it has (at least) two points. This argument can easily be adapted to show that, in a general model category, if $p : E \to B$ is a trivial fibration and $s : B \to E$ is a section of $p : E \to B$, then $s \circ p$ is homotopic to $\textrm{id}_E$ fibrewise over $p : E \to B$. (Slogan: a trivial fibration has contractible fibres.)