$\def\bbC{\mathbb{C}} \def\bbR{\mathbb{R}} $For $r,R\in\bbR$, denote $$ A(r,R)=\{z\in\bbC:r<|z|<R\} $$ to the open annulus in $\bbC$ of inner and outer radii $r$ and $R$, respectively. Suppose that $$ f(z)=\sum_{k=-\infty}^{+\infty}a_{k}z^{k} $$ is a convergent Laurent series in $A(r,R)$. We call $\sum_{k\geq0}a_kz^k$ and $\sum_{k<0}a_kz^k$ the Taylor part and principal part of the Laurent series, respectively. Let $g$ be an entire function such that $g(0)=0$. We have that $g\circ f$ is a holomorphic function in $A(r,R)$ and hence it has a convergent Laurent series development in this annulus. My question is: if the Taylor part of $f$ vanishes, then the Taylor part of $g\circ f$ vanishes as well?
A physicist approach tells me that yes, since if $g(z)=\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}b_kz^k$, then we have $$ g(f(z))=b_1f(z)+b_2f(z)^2+b_3f(z)^3+\cdots $$ and by expanding $f$ and “reordering the terms,” we must end up with a Laurent series with vanishing Taylor part.
The “Taylor part” $\sum_{k\geq0}a_kz^k$ of $f$ vanishes if and only if $f(z) = \sum_{k<0}a_kz^k$ in $A(r, R)$, and that happens if and only if $f$ is the restriction of a function $F$ which is holomorphic in $|z| > r$ with $\lim_{z \to \infty} F(z) = 0$.
In that case is $g \circ f$ the restriction of $g \circ F$, which is also holomorphic in $|z| > r$ with $\lim_{z \to \infty} g(F(z)) = 0$, so that the Taylor part of $g \circ f$ vanishes as well.