Given $m, n$ natural numbers in the binary notation. How can we prove that the function $f(n,m)=[n^{1/m}]$ is computable in polynomial time?
2026-03-30 02:40:05.1774838405
Computable function in polynomial time
400 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPUTER-SCIENCE
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- Simultaneously multiple copies of each of a set of substrings of a string.
- Ackermann Function for $(2,n)$
- Algorithm for diophantine equation
- transforming sigma notation into harmonic series. CLRS A.1-2
- Show that if f(n) is O(g(n) and d(n) is O(h(n)), then f(n) + d(n) is O(g(n) + h(n))
- Show that $2^{n+1}$ is $O(2^n)$
- If true, prove (01+0)*0 = 0(10+0)*, else provide a counter example.
- Minimum number of edges that have to be removed in a graph to make it acyclic
- Mathematics for Computer Science, Problem 2.6. WOP
Related Questions in COMPUTATIONAL-COMPLEXITY
- Product of sums of all subsets mod $k$?
- Proving big theta notation?
- Little oh notation
- proving sigma = BigTheta (BigΘ)
- sources about SVD complexity
- Is all Linear Programming (LP) problems solvable in Polynomial time?
- growth rate of $f(x)= x^{1/7}$
- Unclear Passage in Cook's Proof of SAT NP-Completeness: Why The Machine M Should Be Modified?
- Minimum Matching on the Minimum Triangulation
- How to find the average case complexity of Stable marriage problem(Gale Shapley)?
Related Questions in COMPUTABILITY
- Are all infinite sets of indices of computable functions extensional?
- Simple applications of forcing in recursion theory?
- Proof of "Extension" for Rice's Theorem
- How to interpret Matiyasevich–Robinson–Davis–Putnam in term of algebraic geometry or geometry?
- Does there exist a weakly increasing cofinal function $\kappa \to \kappa$ strictly below the diagonal?
- Why isn't the idea of "an oracle for the halting problem" considered self-contradictory?
- is there any set membership of which is not decidable in polynomial time but semidecidable in P?
- The elementary theory of finite commutative rings
- Is there any universal algorithm converting grammar to Turing Machine?
- Is the sign of a real number decidable?
Related Questions in TURING-MACHINES
- Has the effort to confirm $\Sigma(5)$ and the search for new champions with $6$ states been stopped?
- Pop-up cards Turing complete?
- How does a cellular automaton "know" when to halt?
- Is the halting problem also undecideable for turing machines always writing a $1$ on the tape?
- Proof of "Extension" for Rice's Theorem
- Do we need enumeration to find the maximal number of steps a special Turing machine can make?
- Deciding wether a language is regular, in the arithmetic hierarchy
- Can a machine exist making more steps than the current record, which is no busy beaver?
- Can the halting problem for bounded Turing machines be efficiently decided?
- Can we efficiently determine the function $f(n,s)$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Here is an algorithm that runs in $O(n^4)$ times. This is definitely not the most efficient algorithm but serves as a useful proof that a polynomial algorithm exists.
First, check if
$$m>2n>\frac{\ln(n)}{\ln(2)}$$
(this step can clearly be done in $O(n)$ time just based on the number of binary bits in memory each number $n$ and $m$ takes). If so
$$n^{1/m}<n^{\frac{\ln(2)}{\ln(n)}}=2$$
which implies
$$f(n,m)=\lfloor n^{1/m}\rfloor =1$$
If $m\leq 2n$, then note that
$$f(n,m)=\lfloor n^{1/m}\rfloor\leq n^{1/m}<\lfloor n^{1/m}\rfloor+1=f(n,m)+1$$
$$\Rightarrow f(n,m)^m\leq n<(f(n,m)+1)^m$$
Thus, in order to find $f(n,m)$ it is sufficient to find some natural $k_0$ such that $k_0^m\leq n<(k_0+1)^m$. But this is easy, simply iterate through the natural numbers $k\in \{1,2,3,...,n\}$ and test whether they satisfy the condition above. This can be done in polynomial time as multiplication can be done in $O(k^2)$ time and therefore testing whether $k$ satisfies the condition can be done in $O(mk^2)$. Since $k\leq n$, and we have to perform this action at most $n$ times, we can get a final bound of $O(mn^3)$ for this algorithm. Using the fact that $m\leq 2n$ gives us the final bound of $O(n^4)$.
Example: For $m=2$ and $n=5$ (obviously $m=2<10=2n$), we have that
$$k=1: 1^2=1\text{ and }(1+1)^2=4$$ $$k=2: 2^2=4\text{ and }(2+1)^2=9$$ $$k=3: 3^2=9\text{ and }(3+1)^2=16$$ $$k=4: 4^2=16\text{ and }(4+1)^2=25$$ $$k=5: 5^2=25\text{ and }(5+1)^2=36$$
Thus, we get that $f(n,m)=2$.