Reading the lectures notes by A. Connes and M. Marcolli I have some difficulty undestanding how they compute the Feynman integrals using integration by parts. Consider the following integral of formulas (1.32), (1.34): $$ I = \mathcal N_0∫ φ(x)φ(y) \, \exp(iS_0(φ)) \, \mathcal D[φ], $$ where $\mathcal N_0$ is a normalization factor $$ \mathcal N_0^{-1} = ∫ \exp(iS_0(φ)) \, \mathcal D[φ], $$ and $$ S_O(φ) = (2\pi)^{-D} ∫ \frac 1 2 (p^2 - m^2) \hat φ(p) \hat φ(-p) \, d^D p, \\ \hat φ(p) = ∫ \exp(-i p x) φ(x) \, d^D x. $$ The authors say that using formal integration by parts (note that the the integrand is a product of two linear forms in the fields times the exponent of a quadratic form in the fields) one gets something like: $$ I = i (2\pi)^D ∫ \frac{\delta(p_1+p_2)}{p_1^2-m^2} e^{\pm ip(x-y)} d^D p_1 d^D p_2 $$ I do not understand this computation. Could you please explain it?
2026-03-25 07:38:13.1774424293
Computing a Feynman integral
210 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in QUANTUM-MECHANICS
- Is there a book on the purely mathematical version of perturbation theory?
- Matrix differential equation and matrix exponential
- "Good" Linear Combinations of a Perturbed Wave Function
- Necessary condition for Hermician lin operators
- What is a symplectic form of the rotation group SO(n)
- Why is $\textbf{J}$ called angular momentum?(Quantum)
- How does the quantumstate evolve?
- Differential equation $au''(x)+b\frac{u(x)}{x}+Eu=0$
- How to model this system of $^{238}\,U$ atoms?
- Discrete spectra of generators of compact Lie group
Related Questions in QUANTUM-FIELD-THEORY
- Conserved currents under Lorentz Transformations
- Yang–Mills theory and mass gap
- Complex Gaussian integral
- Quantum invariants of 2-knots
- QFT, more a QM Question, Hamiltonian relation time evolution
- Spinor chiral transformation by $\psi \to \gamma^5 \psi$
- How are topological invariants obtained from TQFTs used in practice?
- Computing energy-momentum tensor with arrowed Feynman slash derivative
- Feynman Vertex Rule, Correlator, 2 diff coupling constants, why no-cross terms
- QFT, Noether and Invariance, Complex fields, Equal mass
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Usually integration by parts under a Gaussian measure refers to the following formula. Let $X$ and $X_i$ be Gaussians. Then $$ \mathbb{E}[Xf(X_1,...,X_n)] = \sum_{i=1}^n\mathbb{E}[X X_i] \mathbb{E}[\frac{\partial}{\partial X_i} f(X_1,...,X_n)]\,. $$ For continuum fields this becomes $$ \int \varphi(x) f(\varphi) e^{i S(\varphi)} D \varphi =\int dz \int \varphi(x) \varphi(z) e^{i S(\varphi)} D \varphi \int \frac{\delta f(\varphi)}{\delta \varphi(z)} e^{iS(\varphi)} D \varphi\,, $$ where $e^{iS(\varphi)} D \varphi$ denotes an infinite dimensional Gaussian measure. Your example corresponds to $f(\varphi) = \varphi(y)$, and the implications of the above formula are rather trivial in this example, thus I find the choice of words in the lecture notes a bit confusing.
In the end the answer to your question depends on how you define your "Gaussian" measure $\mathcal{N}_0 \exp{iS_0(\varphi)} \mathcal{D}[\varphi]$. Formally, this is a Gaussian with the covariance operator $i(\Delta-m^2)^{-1}$ (up to some multiplicative constant, I guess). What is the two point function (the integral $I$) of this?
As an analogy, consider the discrete case, that is, let $X$ be a Gaussian vector in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with covariance matrix $A$. Then \begin{align} \mathbb{E}[X_i X_j] &= \int x_i x_j e^{-\frac{1}{2} (x,A^{-1} x)} d^n x \\ &= \frac{\partial^2}{\partial J_i \partial J_j} \Big|_{J=0} \int e^{-\frac{1}{2} (x,A^{-1} x) + J \cdot x} d^nx\,. \end{align} Thus we can express the two-point function in terms of derivatives of the moment generating function, which can be explicitly computed for Gaussian measures. In the above example, the end result should be $A_{ij}$.
Similarly, in the case of fields, we have \begin{align} \mathcal{N}_0 \int \varphi(x) \varphi(y)\exp{iS_0(\varphi)} \mathcal{D}[\varphi] &= \frac{\delta^2}{\delta J(x) J(y)}\Big|_{J=0} \mathcal{N}_0 \int e^{\int J(z) \varphi(z) dz} \exp{iS_0(\varphi)} \mathcal{D}[\varphi]\,, \end{align} and the rest of the computation are completely analogous to the discrete case. This time the end result is (formally) $$ (\delta_y, i(\Delta-m^2)^{-1} \delta_x)_{L^2} = (\mathcal{F}{\delta_y}, i \mathcal{F}{(\Delta-m^2)^{-1} \delta_x})_{L^2} $$ where $\mathcal{F}$ is the Fourier transform. This simplifies to the form $$ i\int e^{-ik \cdot y} \frac{e^{ik\cdot x}}{|k|^2-m^2} dk $$ This can be rewritten as $$ i \int \frac{\delta(k+k')}{|k|^2-m^2}e^{i(k\cdot x + k'\cdot y)} dkdk' \,, $$ if you prefer.