Let $M$ and $N$ are to compact complex manifolds of dimensions $m$ and $k$ respectively, and $f:M\to N$ is a holomorphic map then how can we compute the components of $f^*g_N$
2026-03-30 06:46:11.1774853171
computing the components of $f^*g_N$
43 Views Asked by user61135 https://math.techqa.club/user/user61135/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in COMPLEX-GEOMETRY
- Numerable basis of holomporphic functions on a Torus
- Relation between Fubini-Study metric and curvature
- Hausdorff Distance Between Projective Varieties
- What can the disk conformally cover?
- Some questions on the tangent bundle of manifolds
- Inequivalent holomorphic atlases
- Reason for Graphing Complex Numbers
- Why is the quintic in $\mathbb{CP}^4$ simply connected?
- Kaehler Potential Convexity
- I want the pullback of a non-closed 1-form to be closed. Is that possible?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The pullback of a Riemannian metric is treated like the general pullback for tensor fields. In other words, $f^*\mathrm{g}(X_q,Y_q)=\mathrm{g}(f_*X_q,f_*Y_q)$. If we are working in a specific chart, we can write out the metric as $$\mathrm{g}=\sum_{i,j}g_{ij}\mathrm{d}x^i\otimes\mathrm{d}x^j.$$ For the ease of calculation, we often just write this out as a matrix, where the $(i,j)^\text{th}$ entry is $g_{ij}$. In this case, you can apply $\mathrm{g}$ to two tangent (column) vectors $v$ and $w$ by left-multiplying this matrix by the transpose of $v$ and right-multiplying by $w$. Since we are working within a local coordinate system, we can represent the pushforward by the Jacobian.
Thus, the new matrix for $f^*\mathrm{g}_N$ would be given by left-multiplying the matrix for $\mathrm{g}_N$ by the transpose of the Jacobian of $f$ in the given coordinates and right-multiplying by the Jacobian of $f$. You can get the new components $g'_{ij}$ from this matrix.