I really hate it when an author randomly brings up new or confusing notation without explanation.
This is an exercise in my linear algebra book on a section of matrix multiplication:
Let $A$ and $B$ be matrices for which the product matrix $AB$ is defined, and let $u_j$ and $v_j$ denote the $j$th columns of $AB$ and $B$, respectively. If $v_p = c_1 v_{j_1} + c_2 v_{j_2} + \cdots c_k v_{j_k}$ for some scalars, $c_1, c_2, \dots, c_k$, prove that $u_p =c_1 u_{j_1} + c_2 u_{j_2} + \cdots + c_k u_{j_k}$.
What's up with $v_{j_i}$ (and $u_{j_i}$)? I don't understand what this represents. My first thought was that it was the $i$th entry of the column vector $v_j$. But I'm very sure that these are supposed to be vectors, it's just that I don't know which vectors they represent. Can anyone help me by clarifying what it means?
Phrased (hopefully!) a bit more clearly, the question is asking this:
What this ultimately means is that we are taking $k$-many columns of the $v_i$; we don't necessarily know which ones, though, so instead of indexing them with $1,2,\cdots,k$, we instead use indices $j_1,j_2,\cdots,j_k$, which helps us avoid dealing with order. We then suppose $v_p$ for some $p$ happens to be equal to $\sum c_i v_{j_i}$ for some choice of scalars $c_i$, and seek to prove a likewise relationship for the $u_i$ (using the same scalars, and the same indices -- so if it turns out that $j_5 = 2$, i.e. $v_{j_5}$ is the second column of $B$, then we will be including $u_{j_5} = u_2$, the second column of $AB$).