While proving that $$\int^{\infty}_0 \frac{\sin x}xdx$$
I saw the Laplace Transform proof.
It used that $$\cal L\left\{\frac{\sin t}{t}\right\}=\int^\infty_0 \cal L\left\{\sin(t)\right\}d\sigma$$
So for understanding it, I tried:
$$\cal L\left\{\frac{\sin t}{t}\right\}=\int^\infty_0e^{-st}\frac{\sin t}{t}dt=\int^\infty_0\frac1t\cal L\left\{\sin t\right\}dt$$
But I cannot see how that $\sigma$ emerged and $t^{-1}$ vanished?
Also, how do we know that using the Laplace transform, we would get an integral that is equal to the original one ($\int^\infty_0\frac{\sin x}{x}dx$)
2026-04-08 07:15:36.1775632536
Confusion in the usage/property of Laplace Transform.
72 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
Your formula is a (too) short notation, suppressing the variable of the Laplace transform. It should read $$\mathcal{L}\left\{\frac{\sin t}{t} \right\} (0) = \int_0^\infty \mathcal{L}\{ \sin t\}(\sigma) \,d\sigma.$$
This follows from the rule `Frequency-domain integration'. A proof of this is rather straightforward. If you have troubles, I can provide some more help.