We are given a sequence $(a_n)$ of real numbers and a real number $a$. I want to show that the following are equivalent:
(i) for each $\epsilon>0$ there exists a $n_0 \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $|a_n-a|<\epsilon$ for each $n \geq n_0$,
(ii) for each $\epsilon>0$ there exists a $n_0 \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $|a_n-a|<2 \epsilon$ for each $n \geq n_0$,
(iii) for each $\epsilon \in (0,1)$ there exists a $n_0 \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $|a_n-a|<\epsilon$ for each $n \geq n_0$,
(iv) for each $\epsilon>0$ there exists a $n_0 \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $|a_n-a|<\frac{\epsilon}{2}$ for each $n \geq n_0$.
I have tried the following:
$(i) \Rightarrow (ii)$:
Since $(i)$ holds, we have that $\forall \epsilon'>0 \ \exists n_0 \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $|a_n-a|<\epsilon'$, $\forall n \geq n_0$.
We pick $\epsilon'=2 \epsilon$. Then we have that $\forall \epsilon>0 \ \exists n_0 \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $|a_n-a|<2 \epsilon$, $\forall n \geq n_0$.
$(ii) \Rightarrow (iii)$:
Since $(ii)$ holds, we have that $\forall \epsilon'>0 \ \exists n_0 \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $|a_n-a|<2 \epsilon'$, $\forall n \geq n_0$. We pick $0<\epsilon'<\frac{\epsilon}{2}<\frac{1}{2}$. Then we get that $\forall \epsilon \in (0,1)$ $\exists n_0 \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $|a_n-a|< \epsilon, \forall n \geq n_0$.
How does $(iii)$ imply $(iv)$ ?
$(iv) \Rightarrow (i)$:
Since $(iv)$ holds, we have that $\forall \epsilon'>0, \exists n_0 \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $|a_n-a|<\frac{\epsilon'}{2}, \forall n \geq n_0$. We pick $\epsilon'=2 \epsilon$. So we have that $\forall \epsilon>0$, $\exists n_0 \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $|a_n-a|<\epsilon$, $\forall n \geq n_0$.
Is everything that I did correct? If we show that $(iii)$ implies $(iv)$, we will have shown that the above statements are equivalent, right?
The crux of the $(iii)\Rightarrow (iv)$ proof is that when you have arbitrary $\epsilon' > 0$ you can always find $\epsilon \in (0,1)$ such that $\epsilon \leq \epsilon'$:
$$ |a_n - a| < \epsilon \leq \epsilon' \Rightarrow |a_n - a| < \epsilon' $$ I'm sure you can now write a full proof yourself.
The proofs that you've written are clean and good. I would make only one small adjustment: when you write
I would write that quantifier $\forall \epsilon>0$ before the whole sentence, like that:
($\forall$ and "Let..." are synonymous in this context.)
In order to write $\epsilon' = 2\epsilon$ it has to be specified what $\epsilon$ is first. That's why almost all proofs of sentences beginning with $\forall x \dots$ start with "Let $x$ be arbitrary.". (The other ones start with a lemma.)