Let $p\in T^3$. How do I construct an immersion of $T^3\setminus\{p\}$ in $\mathbb{R}^3$?
2026-04-03 01:54:38.1775181278
Construction of an immersion of $T^3$ − point in $\mathbb{R}^3$?
77 Views Asked by user297218 https://math.techqa.club/user/user297218/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in MANIFOLDS
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- On the differentiable manifold definition given by Serge Lang
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- Integration of one-form
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-TOPOLOGY
- Getting a self-homeomorphism of the cylinder from a self-homeomorphism of the circle
- what is Sierpiński topology?
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- The regularity of intersection of a minimal surface and a surface of positive mean curvature?
- What's the regularity of the level set of a ''semi-nondegenerate" smooth function on closed manifold?
- Help me to prove related path component and open ball
- Poincarè duals in complex projective space and homotopy
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
- Prove that the sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$ which are both open and closed are $\emptyset$ and $\mathbb{R}^n$
Related Questions in GEOMETRIC-TOPOLOGY
- Finite covers of handlebodies?
- CW complexes are compactly generated
- Constructing a fat Cantor Set with certain property
- Homologically zero circles in smooth manifolds
- Labeled graphs with unimodular adjacency matrix
- Pseudoisotopy between nonisotopic maps
- A topological question about loops and fixed points
- "Continuity" of volume function on hyperbolic tetrahedra
- Example of path connected metric space whose hyperspace with Vietoris topology is not path connected?
- What is the pushout of $D^n \longleftarrow S^{n-1} \longrightarrow D^n$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This is not terribly hard to see what's going on, though it's quite hard to write down a formula. Let's start by determining what $T^3 \setminus \{pt\}$ is.
First, look at its handlebody structure. This is a sort of thickened CW-structure. You start with a 3-ball $D^3$. Then you attach three "1-handles" $D^2 \times [0,1]$ by gluing on the 'sides' $D^2 \times \{0,1\}$ to the boundary of $D^3$; do this however you like, as long as the embeddings of $D^2$ are orientation-preserving. So far, we've just got a 3-ball with some handles on it. This is easy to embed in $\Bbb R^3$: whatever picture you've got is correct. Call this, I guess, $X^1$ so far.
Now one attaches three "2-handles" $D^1 \times D^2$ by the "boundary" $D^1 \times S^1$. Just like with the CW structure of the torus, these are attached by (thickenings) of the loops $[a,b]$, $[a,c]$, and $[b,c]$ in $\partial X^1 = \Sigma_3$. It's not too hard to make sure these loops are embedded in $\partial X^1$. Now let's attach the 2-handles to the embedding; this is where we're forced to make it an immersion. If you draw the picture, it's not terribly difficult to see how one might do this. (Sorry for the lack of details: It's hard to draw a picture of this, and I find it difficult to describe in words. The idea is to "contract" the loop $S^1$ to a point in a way that's an embedding of the disc $D^2$.)
Once you've done this three times, you have an immersion of $X^2$ into $\Bbb R^3$. What's left? Well, $\partial X^2 = S^2$, so to get $T^3$ you would attach a ball. This is impossible to do immersively. But to get $T^3 \setminus \{pt\}$ you just need to attach $S^2 \times [0,1)$! This is much easier. Suppose for convenience that our immersion never mapped to $0$. Then the immersion $i$ of $\partial X^2$ obviously extends to an immersion of $S^2 \times [0,1)$: just pick $i(x,t) = t \cdot i(x)$!
One minor technicality to note is that when doing handlebodies, it looks like what you get at each stage is a manifold with corners. But you can just smooth those corners out as you go.