I want to prove the following and have no idea how to proceed:
For a continuous function $f: X \mapsto Y$ where $X$ is Polish and $Y$ is Hausdorff the following are equivalent:
$f[X]$ is uncountable
There is a a perfect set $P \subset X$ such that $f|_p$ is one-to-one.
There is a countable set $Q \subset X$ with no isolated points such that $f|_Q$ is one-to-one.
It 'smells' like the Cantor–Bendixson Theorem, but have no idea how to use it. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
EDIT:
This is as far as I can go in proving it. I will use the following theorems from Srivastava, A course on Borel sets (loosely cited):
2.6.1 Every dense-in-itself Polish space $X$ contains a copy of $2^\omega$
2.6.2 (Cantor – Bendixson theorem) Every separable metric space $X$ can be written as $X = P \cup Q$ where $Q$ is countable, $P$ is perfect, and $P,Q$ are disjoint.
2.6.7 Let $E$ be a closed equivalence relation on a Polish space $X$ with uncountably many equivalence classes. Then there is a copy of $2^\omega$ in X consisting of pairwise inequivalent elements.
2) $\Rightarrow$ 1)
There is perfect $P \subset X$ on which function is one to one. It contains homeomorph of $2^\omega$ and is separable, so $P$ is of cardinality $\mathfrak c$. Hence $|f[X]| \geq | f [P] | = |P| = \mathfrak c$
1) $\Rightarrow$ 2)
By AC we choose one element from each nonempty layer $f^{-1}[\{y\}]$. We sum them up, acquiring uncountable $A \subset X$. Using C-B theorem we write it as $A = P \cup Q$ where $P$ is nonempty (because $A$ is uncountable and $Q$ is countable) set, perfect in $A$. Problem is that we are not sure if it is perfect in $X$. But $P$ is dense-in-itself, so if it was a $G_\delta$ set it would be a Polish space (Aleksandrov theorem). Hence it would contain a copy $D$ of $2^\omega$. Cantor set is perfect and $D$ is closed in $X$ by compactness hence it is perfect set in $X$, the one that we are looking for.
Suppose that layers of $f$ induce closed equivalence relationship on $X$. Then there exists copy of Cantor set with one element in each equivalence class. By previous argument it is the perfect set we are looking for.
Unfortunately I have no idea how to assure the assumptions I am using. Any help/ideas?
Here's a sketch for (1) implies (2): Fix $A \subseteq X$ be uncountable such that $f \upharpoonright A$ is one-one. By deleting at most countably many points from $A$ we can assume that every point of $A$ is a condensation point of $A$ - Recall that $x$ is a condensation point of $A$ if every neighborhood of $x$ contains uncountably many points of $A$. Now define a tree $\langle B_{\sigma} : \sigma \in 2^{< \omega} \rangle$ such that the following hold: $B_{\phi} = X$, $B_{\sigma 0}, B_{\sigma 1}$ are disjoint closed balls contained in $B_{\sigma}$, $f[B_{\sigma 0}] \cap f[B_{\sigma_1}] = \phi$ and radius of $B_{\sigma} $ is at most $2^{-n}$. To guide this construction, always keep the centers of your balls in $A$. That $Y$ is Hausdorff helps you satisfy $f[B_{\sigma 0}] \cap f[B_{\sigma_1}] = \phi$. Finally your perfect set is simply all the points that lie in the intersection of a branch in $\langle B_{\sigma} : \sigma \in 2^{< \omega} \rangle$. It should be clear that $f$ is one-one on this perfect set.
Hope this helped :)
@Pedro's comment: You don't need $\neg CH$ to conclude that the range of any continuous function from a second countable space to $\omega_1$ is bounded. Just use the fact that every unbounded subset of $\omega_1$ contains uncountably many pairwise disjoint open sets.