I have been given the fact that a fluid is subjected to a decaying electric field of (scalar) magnitude: $$ e(\boldsymbol{x},t)=r^{-1}e^{-At},$$$$r^2=x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2$$ where $A$ is a positive constant, and the Eulerian velocity of the fluid is: $$v(\boldsymbol{x},t)=(x_1x_3,tx_2^2,tx_2x_3)$$ and I have to work out the material rate of change of $e$ at time $t=1$ of the particle at the point $\boldsymbol{x}=(2,-2,1)$. I haven't really done much mechanics in maths so the 'decaying electric field' is kind of new to me. I know that the material derivative is given by $$\nabla{e}{\cdot}v+e_t$$ So my questions is basically... how do I work out the gradient of $e$ when I have been given it in this form? Do I need to put in the given $x$ co-ordinates first, to obtain $r^2$ and then work out $\nabla{e}$ from there? Any help would be much appreciated!
2026-03-30 02:07:13.1774836433
Continuum mechanics: Finding the material derivative of plasma subjected to a decaying electric field
218 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DERIVATIVE
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Partial derivative of a summation
- How might I find, in parametric form, the solution to this (first order, quasilinear) PDE?
- Solving a PDE given initial/boundary conditions.
- Proof for f must be a constant polynomial
Related Questions in FLUID-DYNAMICS
- How to prove a Minimal Surface minimizes Surface Tension
- Confusion about vector tensor dot product
- Stationary Condition of Variational Iteration Method
- Partial derivatives and path integrals
- Complex potentials and gradient
- 1D viscous flow upwards against gravity
- Higher order of the convection term approximation
- Show that using Suffix Notation
- Fluid Dynamics Proof
- Conversion of Surface integral to a suitable Volume integral.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
First off MHD is a topic close to my heart!!
The material derivative is not as you have given (or a typo) and instead is given by $$ \partial_t e + \mathbf{v}\cdot\nabla e $$ To compute the $\mathbf{v}\cdot \nabla$ we go as follows $$ \left(x_{1}x_{3},tx_{2}^{2},tx_{2}x_{3}\right)\cdot\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{1}},\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{2}},\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{3}}\right) $$ This equates to $$ x_{1}x_{3}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{1}} + tx_{2}^{2}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{2}} + tx_{2}x_{3}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{3}} $$
for which you can sub back into the original "material derivative". Then to complete your answer, you can compute the derivatives of r with respect to $x_{i}$ as normal. Alternatively you could of converted all the derivatives into cylindrical or spherical geometry, but I think the way i outlined above is more straight forward.
To explicitly show how to take the derivative, I will compute the first term. $$ x_{1}x_{3}\frac{\partial e}{\partial x_{1}} = x_{1}x_{3}\frac{\partial }{\partial x_{1}}\left(-\frac{1}{r}\mathrm{e}^{-At}\right) = \mathrm{e}^{-At}\frac{-x_{1}x_{3}}{r^{2}}\frac{\partial r}{\partial x_{1}} $$ You can finish off the differentiation. So now since i decided to stay in these cartesian co-ordinates, it makes compute the derivatives more cumbersome, but not impossible. You will have to do the same for the derivatives with respect to $x_{2}$ and $x_3$.