Suppose we have a sequence of non decreasing random variables that converges to 0 in distribution. How can we prove that this sequence converges to 0 almost surely?
2026-03-29 20:49:43.1774817383
Convergence in Distribution implies convergences almost surely
1.3k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY-LIMIT-THEOREMS
- weak limit similiar to central limit theorem
- What is the name of the method or process when a system is evaluated against the highest degree terms?
- Law of large numbers and a different model for the average of IID trials
- Prove that regression beta of order statistics converges to 1?
- Random variable convergence question
- How does this sequence of distributions converge?
- Determine limit distribution
- Relation between (non-random) Big O and probability little o
- How to derive approximation result from Levy 0-1 law?
- binomial normal with dependent success probability
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I will use two standard theorems :
(1) Convergence in Distribution to a constant r.v. $\Rightarrow$ Convergence in Probability
(2) If $X_n$ converges in probability to $X$ then there exists a subsequence $X_{n_k}$ such that $X_{n_k}$ converges almost surely to $X$ as $k \rightarrow \infty$.
For the given problem, $X_n(w)$ is a bounded non-decreasing sequence, therefore, $\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}X_n(w)$ exists for all $w$. Let $n_k$ be the subsequence from (2) above. Let $T = \mathrm{P}[w : X_{n_k}(w) \rightarrow 0]$. Then $X_n(w) \rightarrow 0$ for all $w \in T$. From (2) we know $P(T) = 1$ and we are done.