Is there a way to assess the convergence of the following series? $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\sin(n!)}{n}$$ From numerical estimations it seems to be convergent but I don't know how to prove it.
2026-03-31 14:15:09.1774966509
Convergence of $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\sin(n!)}{n}$
3.9k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in SEQUENCES-AND-SERIES
- How to show that $k < m_1+2$?
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Negative Countdown
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Show that the sequence is bounded below 3
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Convergence of a rational sequence to a irrational limit
- studying the convergence of a series:
Related Questions in CONVERGENCE-DIVERGENCE
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Conditions for the convergence of :$\cos\left( \sum_{n\geq0}{a_n}x^n\right)$
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Pointwise and uniform convergence of function series $f_n = x^n$
- studying the convergence of a series:
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- If $a_{1}>2$and $a_{n+1}=a_{n}^{2}-2$ then Find $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}$ $\frac{1}{a_{1}a_{2}......a_{n}}$
- Convergence radius of power series can be derived from root and ratio test.
- Does this sequence converge? And if so to what?
- Seeking an example of Schwartz function $f$ such that $ \int_{\bf R}\left|\frac{f(x-y)}{y}\right|\ dy=\infty$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Here is a proof that the answer is (almost certainly) not provable using current techniques. We will prove that the series in fact diverges if $2\pi e$ is a rational number with a prime numerator. We first prove the following claims:
Lemma 1. If $p$ is an odd prime number and $S\subset \mathbb Z$ so that $$\sum_{s\in S}e^{2\pi i s/p}\in\mathbb R,$$ then $\sum_{s\in S}s\equiv 0\bmod p$.
Proof. Let $\zeta=e^{2\pi i/p}$. We have $$\sum_{s\in S}\zeta^s=\sum_{s\in S}\zeta^{-s},$$ since the sum is its own conjugate. As a result, since the minimal polynomial of $\zeta$ is $\frac{\zeta^p-1}{\zeta-1}$, we see $$\frac{x^p-1}{x-1}\bigg|\sum_{s\in S}\left(x^{p+s}-x^{p-s}\right),$$ where we have placed each element of $s$ in $[0,p)$. The polynomial on the left is coprime with $x-1$ and the polynomial on the right has it as a factor, so $$\frac{x^p-1}{x-1}\bigg|\sum_{s\in S}\left(x^{p+s-1}+\cdots+x^{p-s}\right).$$ Now, the quotient of these two polynomials must be an integer polynomial, so in particular the value of the left-side polynomial at $1$ must divide the value of the right-side polynomial at $1$. This gives $p|\sum_{s\in S}2s,$ finishing the proof.
Define $$a_n=\sum_{k=0}^n \frac{n!}{k!}.$$
Lemma 2. If $p$ is a prime number, $$\sum_{n=0}^{p-1}a_n\equiv -1\bmod p.$$ Proof. \begin{align*} \sum_{n=0}^{p-1}a_n &=\sum_{0\leq k\leq n\leq p-1}\frac{n!}{k!}\\ &=\sum_{0\leq n-k\leq n\leq p-1}(n-k)!\binom n{n-k}\\ &=\sum_{j=0}^{p-1}\sum_{n=j}^{p-1}n(n-1)\cdots(n-j+1)\\ &\equiv \sum_{j=0}^{p-1}\sum_{n=0}^{p-1}n(n-1)\cdots(n-j+1)\pmod p, \end{align*} where we have set $j=n-k$. The inside sum is a sum of a polynomial over all elements of $\mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z$, and as a result it is $0$ as long as the polynomial is of degree less than $p-1$ and it is $-1$ for a monic polynomial of degree $p-1$. Since the only term for which this polynomial is of degree $p-1$ is $j=p-1$, we get the result.
Now, let $2\pi e = p/q$. Define $\mathcal E(x)=e^{2\pi i x}$ to map from $\mathbb R/\mathbb Z$, and note that $\mathcal E(x+\epsilon)=\mathcal E(x)+O(\epsilon)$. We have \begin{align*} \sin((n+p)!) &=\operatorname{Im}\mathcal E\left(\frac{(n+p)!}{2\pi}\right)\\ &=\operatorname{Im}\mathcal E\left(\frac{qe(n+p)!}{p}\right). \end{align*} We will investigate $\frac{qe(n+p)!}{p}$ "modulo $1$." We see that \begin{align*} \frac{qe(n+p)!}{p} &=q\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{(n+p)!}{pk!}\\ &\equiv q\sum_{k=n+1}^\infty \frac{(n+p)!}{pk!}\pmod 1\\ &=O(1/n)+q\sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p}\frac{(n+p)!}{pk!}\\ &=O(1/n)+\frac qp\left[\sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p}\frac{(n+p)!}{k!}\pmod p\right]. \end{align*} Now, \begin{align*} \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p}\frac{(n+p)!}{k!}=\sum_{j=0}^{p-1}\frac{(n+p)!}{(n+p-j)!} &=\sum_{j=0}^{p-1}(n+p)(n+p-1)\cdots(n+p-j+1)\\ &\equiv \sum_{j=0}^{p-1}m(m-1)\cdots (m-j+1)\pmod p, \end{align*} where $m$ is the remainder when $n$ is divided by $p$. The terms with $j>m$ in this sum go to $0$, giving us $$\sum_{j=0}^m \frac{m!}{(m-j)!}=a_m.$$ Putting this together, we see that $$\sin((n+p)!)=\operatorname{Im}\mathcal E\left(\frac{qa_{n\bmod p}}p\right)+O\left(\frac 1n\right).$$ In particular, the convergence of our sum would imply, since the $O(1/n)$ terms give a convergent series when multiplied by $O(1/n)$, that $$x_N=\operatorname{Im}\sum_{n=1}^N\frac 1n\mathcal E\left(\frac{qa_{n\bmod p}}p\right)$$ should converge. In particular, $\{x_{pN}\}$ must converge, which implies that $$\sum_{m=0}^{p-1}\mathcal E\left(\frac{qa_m}p\right)$$ must be real (as otherwise the series diverges like the harmonic series). By Lemma 1, this implies that $$\sum_{m=0}^{p-1}a_m=0\bmod p,$$ which contradicts Lemma 2.