What is the intuitive explanation for convex risk measures represented as: $$\rho(X)=\sup_{P\in Q}\{E_{P}(-X)+\alpha(P)\}$$ where $\alpha(P)$ is a penalty function depending on the plausibility of P. I understand that the function measures the maximum expected loss and the higher the value of X, the lesser the risk but this looks like a concave function. Assist with any intuition about the supremum.
2026-03-25 06:30:48.1774420248
Convex risk measures
304 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
There are 2 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY
- How to prove $\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} e^{-n}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{n^k}{k!} = \frac{1}{2}$?
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- A random point $(a,b)$ is uniformly distributed in a unit square $K=[(u,v):0<u<1,0<v<1]$
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Solution Check. (Probability)
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in CONVEX-ANALYSIS
- Proving that: $||x|^{s/2}-|y|^{s/2}|\le 2|x-y|^{s/2}$
- Convex open sets of $\Bbb R^m$: are they MORE than connected by polygonal paths parallel to the axis?
- Show that this function is concave?
- In resticted domain , Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz's inequality
- Area covered by convex polygon centered at vertices of the unit square
- How does positive (semi)definiteness help with showing convexity of quadratic forms?
- Why does one of the following constraints define a convex set while another defines a non-convex set?
- Concave function - proof
- Sufficient condition for strict minimality in infinite-dimensional spaces
- compact convex sets
Related Questions in INTUITION
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Intuition for $\int_Cz^ndz$ for $n=-1, n\neq -1$
- Intuition on Axiom of Completeness (Lower Bounds)
- What is the point of the maximum likelihood estimator?
- Why are functions of compact support so important?
- What is it, intuitively, that makes a structure "topological"?
- geometric view of similar vs congruent matrices
- Weighted average intuition
- a long but quite interesting adding and deleting balls problem
- What does it mean, intuitively, to have a differential form on a Manifold (example inside)
Related Questions in RISK-ASSESSMENT
- Risk Management System
- Compound Poisson models with completely monotone claim sizes
- Percent loss covered on average with a deductible
- Two-horse race probabilities
- $ES_X(p)$ of a Lognormal
- Toy problem: How much should I rationally be willing to pay for this hypothetical and simplified insurance?
- Utility premium
- Existence of functionals on $L^0$
- Cramér-Lundberg model for on-demand insurance
- Why must risk averse be correlated with a concave utility function?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You can show that it is convex in the following way.
Note that the supremum is sub-additive in the sense that the supremum of a sum is less than or equal to the sum of the supremums, that is,
$$\sup_{P\in Q}\left(f(P)+g(P)\right)\leq \sup_{P\in Q} f(P) + \sup_{P\in Q} g(P),$$ where $f$ and $g$ are some (possible stochastic) functions of the measure $P$, and where $Q$ is your collection of probability measures.
To show that your risk measure $\rho$ is convex, take some $\lambda\in [0,1]$, and take some random variables/risks/portfolios $X$ and $Y$. You want to show that $$\rho(\lambda X + (1-\lambda) Y) \leq \lambda\rho(X)+(1-\lambda)\rho(Y),$$ because this is what it means to be convex. Starting from the left, using linearity of the expected value, using the trick $\alpha(P) = \lambda\alpha(P)+(1-\lambda)\alpha(P)$, and using the sub-additivity of the supremum, you get:
$$ \begin{align*} \rho(\lambda X + (1-\lambda)Y) &= \sup_{P\in Q}\left[\mathbb{E}_P(-(\lambda X + (1-\lambda)Y))+\alpha(P)\right]\\ &= \sup_{P\in Q}\left[\lambda\mathbb{E}_P(-X) + (1-\lambda)\mathbb{E}_P(-Y)+\lambda\alpha(P)+(1-\lambda)\alpha(P)\right]\\ &= \sup_{P\in Q}\left[\lambda(\mathbb{E}_P(-X)+\alpha(P)) + (1-\lambda)(\mathbb{E}_P(-Y)+\alpha(P))\right]\\ &\leq \sup_{P\in Q}\left[\lambda(\mathbb{E}_P(-X)+\alpha(P))\right] + \sup_{P\in Q}\left[(1-\lambda)(\mathbb{E}_P(-Y)+\alpha(P))\right]\\ &= \lambda\sup_{P\in Q}\left[\mathbb{E}_P(-X)+\alpha(P)\right] + (1-\lambda)\sup_{P\in Q}\left[\mathbb{E}_P(-Y)+\alpha(P)\right]\\ &= \lambda\rho(X) + (1-\lambda)\rho(Y). \end{align*} $$