I have this problem: Let $X$ be an open bounded subset of $\mathbb{R}^n,$ and fix $x_0\in X.$ For all $e\in S^{n-1}$ we put $$\phi(e)=\sup\{t\geq0: x_0+te\in X\}$$ $$\overline{\phi}(e)=\inf\{t\geq0: x_0+te\in \mathbb{R}^n-\overline{X}\}$$ I was able to prove that $\phi:S^{n-1}\to[0,\infty)$ is a lower semicontinuous function and $\overline{\phi}:S^{n-1}\to[0,\infty)$ is an upper semicontinuous function. Now, if $X$ is also convex, I would like to prove that these two maps coincide. If $X$ is convex the two sets $A=\{t\geq0: x_0+te\in X\}$, $B=\{t\geq0: x_0+te\in \mathbb{R}^n-\overline{X}\}$ are intervals, and $0\in A.$ Moreover, they are disjoint, since it is not possible that a point belongs to both $A$ and $B,$ and $\phi(e)=\sup{A}\leq\inf{B}=\overline{\phi}(e).$ If $\phi(e)<\overline{\phi}(e),$ I should have an interval of points $t$ such that $x_0+te\in\partial A,$ but I can't see how to conclude. How can I prove that $\phi=\overline{\phi}?$
2026-02-23 04:44:32.1771821872
Convex sets and semicontinuous functions
95 Views Asked by user558035 https://math.techqa.club/user/user558035/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in SEMICONTINUOUS-FUNCTIONS
- The reason for a certain requirement in upper-semicontinuity
- Lower semicontinuous submeasure is countably subadditive
- Prove that a function is upper semi-continuous
- How to remember which is lower/upper semicontinuity?
- Lower semicontinuity and partial minimization
- For a continuous function defined on [a,b] , is the set of points at which f(x)>d closed set?
- $f$ is LSC at $x$ if and only if $\lim_{\delta \to 0}\inf\{f(y) | y \in B(x,\delta)\}=f(x)$
- How to show lower semicontinuity: differentiability $\rightarrow$ continuity $\rightarrow$ lower semicontinuity?
- Subharmonic on $U$ iff subharmonic on each $U_{\alpha}$, where $(U_{\alpha})$ is an open cover of $U$
- One-Sided Notion of Topological Closure
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Consider the set $\{ x_0 + t e: t\geq 0 \} := L $ which is a ray in $\mathbb{R}^n$. In view of boundedness of $X$ the intersection $L \cap \partial X \neq \emptyset$. Let $t_0 > 0$ be such that $p_0: = x_0 + t_0 e \in \partial X$. Thanks to the convexity of $X$ there exists a supporting hyperplane of $X$ through $p_0$, meaning that there is a hyperplane $\mathcal{H} \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ passing through the point $p_0$ and having $X$ entirely on one side of it. From this it follows that the intersection of $L$ with $\partial X$ consists of a single point, which is $p_0 = x_0 + t_0 e$.
We now show that $\phi(e) = \overline{\phi}(e) = t_0$. Indeed, due to the definition of $t_0$, for all $0<t<t_0$ we have $x_0 + t e \in X$ and $x_0 + t_0 e \notin X$, hence $\varphi (e) = t_0$. Similarly for all $t>t_0$ we have $x_0 + te \notin \overline{X}$ and $x_0 + t_0 e \in \overline{X}$, implying that $\overline{\phi}(e) = t_0$.