Trying to prove the following identity (obtained from a problem in statistical mechanics):
\begin{equation} S(\ell, m) = \sum_{k=m}^{\ell}\binom{k}{m} \sum_{i=0}^{k}(-1)^{\ell+i} \,S(\ell + i - m, k)\, s(k, i) \,\binom{\ell}{\ell+i-m}, \end{equation}
where $S$ and $s$ denote Stirling numbers of the second and first kind, respectively.
I tested the identity in Mathematica and it yielded true values for $0 \leq m\leq \ell \leq 50$ so I think it's true in general, but I haven't seen it in any relevant texts (I've checked Gould's Combinatorial Identities and Roman's Umbral Calculus).
It also doesn't seem to easily reduce to any standard convolution identities (like 23. and 24. in http://mathworld.wolfram.com/StirlingNumberoftheSecondKind.html or 19, 23, 27, or 33 in http://dlmf.nist.gov/26.8#SS4.info)
Could anyone construct a combinatorial proof?
Suppose we seek to verify that
$${n\brace m} = \sum_{k=m}^n {k\choose m} \sum_{q=0}^k (-1)^{n+q} {n+q-m\brace k} (-1)^{k+q} \left[k\atop q\right] {n\choose n+q-m}$$
which is
$${n\brace m} = (-1)^n \sum_{k=m}^n {k\choose m} (-1)^k \sum_{q=0}^k {n+q-m\brace k} \left[k\atop q\right] {n\choose m-q}$$
where presumably $n\ge m.$ We need for the second binomial coefficient that $m\ge q$ so this is
$${n\brace m} = (-1)^n \sum_{k=m}^n {k\choose m} (-1)^k \sum_{q=0}^m {n+q-m\brace k} \left[k\atop q\right] {n\choose m-q}.$$
Observe that the Stirling number of the second kind vanishes when $k\gt n$ so we may extend the summation to infinity, getting
$${n\brace m} = (-1)^n \sum_{k\ge m} {k\choose m} (-1)^k \sum_{q=0}^m {n+q-m\brace k} \left[k\atop q\right] {n\choose m-q}.$$
Recall that
$$\left[k\atop q\right] = [w^q] k! \times {w+k-1\choose k}.$$
Starting with the inner sum we obtain
$$n! \sum_{q=0}^m \frac{1}{(m-q)!} [z^{n+q-m}] (\exp(z)-1)^k [w^q] {w+k-1\choose k} \\ = n! \sum_{q=0}^m \frac{1}{q!} [z^{n-q}] (\exp(z)-1)^k [w^{m-q}] {w+k-1\choose k}.$$
Now when $q\gt m$ the coefficient extractor in $w$ yields zero, hence we may extend the sum in $q$ to infinity:
$$n! \sum_{q\ge 0} \frac{1}{q!} [z^{n-q}] (\exp(z)-1)^k [w^{m-q}] {w+k-1\choose k}.$$
We thus obtain
$$\frac{n!}{2\pi i} \int_{|z|=\epsilon} \frac{1}{z^{n+1}} (\exp(z)-1)^k \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{|w|=\gamma} \frac{1}{w^{m+1}} {w+k-1\choose k} \sum_{q\ge 0} \frac{1}{q!} z^q w^q \; dw \; dz \\ = \frac{n!}{2\pi i} \int_{|z|=\epsilon} \frac{1}{z^{n+1}} (\exp(z)-1)^k \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{|w|=\gamma} \frac{1}{w^{m+1}} {w+k-1\choose k} \exp(zw) \; dw \; dz.$$
Preparing the outer sum we obtain
$$\sum_{k\ge m} {k\choose m} (-1)^k (\exp(z)-1)^k {w+k-1\choose k} \\ = \sum_{k\ge m} {k\choose m} (-1)^k (\exp(z)-1)^k [v^k] \frac{1}{(1-v)^w}.$$
Note that for a formal power series $Q(v)$ we have
$$\sum_{k\ge m} {k\choose m} (-1)^{k-m} u^{k-m} [v^k] Q(v) = \frac{1}{m!} \left.(Q(v))^{(m)}\right|_{v=-u}.$$
We get for the derivative in $v$
$$\left(\frac{1}{(1-v)^w}\right)^{(m)} = m! {w+m-1\choose m} \frac{1}{(1-v)^{w+m}}.$$
Substituting $u=\exp(z)-1$ yields
$$m! {w+m-1\choose m} \exp(-(w+m)z).$$
Returning to the double integral we find
$$\frac{(-1)^n\times n!}{2\pi i} \int_{|z|=\epsilon} \frac{1}{z^{n+1}} (\exp(z)-1)^m (-1)^m \\ \times \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{|w|=\gamma} \frac{1}{w^{m+1}} \exp(zw) {w+m-1\choose m} \exp(-(w+m)z) \; dw \; dz \\ = \frac{(-1)^n\times n!}{2\pi i} \int_{|z|=\epsilon} \frac{1}{z^{n+1}} (\exp(z)-1)^m (-1)^m \exp(-mz) \\ \times \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{|w|=\gamma} \frac{1}{w^{m+1}} {w+m-1\choose m} \; dw \; dz \\ = \frac{(-1)^n\times n!}{2\pi i \times m!} \int_{|z|=\epsilon} \frac{1}{z^{n+1}} (\exp(z)-1)^m (-1)^m \exp(-mz) \; dz \\ = \frac{(-1)^n\times n!}{2\pi i \times m!} \int_{|z|=\epsilon} \frac{1}{z^{n+1}} (1-\exp(-z))^m (-1)^m \; dz \\ = \frac{(-1)^n\times n!}{2\pi i \times m!} \int_{|z|=\epsilon} \frac{1}{z^{n+1}} (\exp(-z)-1)^m \; dz.$$
Finally put $z=-v$ to get
$$-\frac{(-1)^n\times n!}{2\pi i \times m!} \int_{|v|=\epsilon} \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{v^{n+1}} (\exp(v)-1)^m \; dv \\ = \frac{n!}{2\pi i \times m!} \int_{|v|=\epsilon} \frac{1}{v^{n+1}} (\exp(v)-1)^m \; dv.$$
This is
$$n! [v^n] \frac{(\exp(v)-1)^m}{m!} = {n\brace m}$$
and we have the claim.