I have to calculate the following convolution $\mathcal{J}$: $$ \mathcal{J} = f(\omega)\delta(\omega-\xi)\ast g(\omega)\delta(\omega-\zeta), $$ where $f$ and $g$ are functions well behaved to do this operation and $\delta$ is the Dirac delta. According to the definition of convolution, we have $$ \mathcal{J} = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(\omega-\eta)\delta(\omega-\xi-\eta)g(\eta)\delta(\eta-\zeta)d\eta. $$ However, the result of $\mathcal{J}$ depends on which $\delta$ I consider to do the integration. I look for answers on this site, and found out this question where it is used (what I think ) the following property: $$ f(x)\delta(x-a)\ast g(x)\delta(x-b) = f(a)g(b)\delta(x-a-b). $$ Is this a definition for such type of convolution? If not, how can I calculate $\mathcal{J}?$
2026-04-04 06:57:11.1775285831
Convolution with functions and two Dirac deltas
344 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CONVOLUTION
- What is the result of $x(at) * δ(t-k)$
- Convolution sum
- PDF of the sum of two random variables integrates to >1
- If $u \in \mathscr{L}^1(\lambda^n), v\in \mathscr{L}^\infty (\lambda^n)$, then $u \star v$ is bounded and continuous.
- Proof of Young's inequality $\Vert u \star v \Vert_p \le \Vert u \Vert_1 \Vert v \Vert_p.$
- Duhamel's principle for heat equation.
- Computing the convolution of $f(x)=\gamma1_{(\alpha,\alpha+\beta)}(x)$
- Convolution of distributions property
- Self-convolution of $f(\vec{r}) = e^{-x^2-y^2}/r^2$
- Inverse $z$-transform similar to convolution
Related Questions in DIRAC-DELTA
- What is the result of $x(at) * δ(t-k)$
- Solution to ODE with Dirac Delta satisfies ODE
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Approximating derivative of Dirac delta function using mollifiers
- How to prove this Dirac delta limit representation is correct?
- $\int_{-\epsilon}^\epsilon\delta(f(x))g(x)dx=\frac{g(0)}{f'(0)}$?
- Properties about Dirac Delta derivative
- Dirac / Fourier relation
- Prove that $\frac{1}{\epsilon}\int_{\mathbb{R}}f(t).\exp\left(\frac{-\pi(x-t)^2}{\epsilon^2}\right)dt \xrightarrow{\epsilon \to 0}f(x) $
- Integral involving delta functions and vector quantities
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Forgive me for using notation I'm more used to. Instead of $\omega$, I'll use $x$ as the free variable and instead of $\delta(x-x_0)$, I'll just write $\delta_{x_0}$. The convolution you're asking for is then: $$ f \, \delta_\xi \; * \; g \, \delta_\zeta $$
Solution using Fourier transform
Initially, I would approach this problem using the properties of Fourier transform. Specifically these two properties will be useful: $$ \def\R{\mathbb{R}} \def\F{\mathcal{F}} \def\e{\mathrm{e}} \def\i{\mathrm{i}} \def\d{\mathrm{d}} \F(fg) = \F(f) * \F(g) \\ \F(f * g) = \F(f) \, \F(g) $$ As it turns out, there's a much simpler solution (presented down below), but I'll keep it here just for completeness. Applying the rules to the distributions in question, we get: $$ \begin{aligned} &\F( \; f \, \delta_\xi \; * \; g \, \delta_\zeta \; ) \\ &= \F( f \, \delta_\xi) \; \F(g \, \delta_\zeta) = \Big( \F(f) * \F(\delta_\xi) \Big) \; \Big( \F(g) * \F(\delta_\zeta) \Big) = ( \tilde f * \e^{-2\pi\i\xi x} )( \tilde g * \e^{-2\pi\i\zeta x} ) \\ &= \Bigg( \int \tilde f(y) \; \e^{-2\pi\i\xi \, (x-y)} \d{y} \Bigg) \Bigg( \int \tilde g(y) \; \e^{-2\pi\i\zeta \, (x-y)} \d{y} \Bigg) \\ &= \e^{-2\pi\i\xi x} \;\Bigg( \int \tilde f(y) \; \e^{2\pi\i\xi y} \d{y} \Bigg) \; \e^{-2\pi\i\zeta x} \;\Bigg( \int \tilde g(y) \; \e^{2\pi\i\zeta y} \d{y} \Bigg) \\ &= \e^{-2\pi\i\xi x} \; \F^{-1}(\tilde f)(\xi) \; \e^{-2\pi\i\zeta x} \; \F^{-1}(\tilde g)(\zeta) \\[5pt] &= \e^{-2\pi\i \, (\xi + \zeta) \, x} \; f(\xi) \; g(\zeta) \end{aligned} $$ Finally we will do the inverse Fourier transform: $$ \begin{aligned} f \, \delta_\xi \; * \; g \, \delta_\zeta &\;=\; \F^{-1}(\; \e^{-2\pi\i \, (\xi + \zeta) \, x} \; f(\xi) \; g(\zeta) \;) \\[5pt] &\;=\; f(\xi) \; g(\zeta) \; \F^{-1}(\; \e^{-2\pi\i \, (\xi + \zeta) \, x} \;) \\[5pt] &\;=\; f(\xi) \; g(\zeta) \; \delta_{\xi + \zeta} \end{aligned} $$ Keep in mind that all the refinements I did were only formal, I didn't check whether all the expressions were well-defined. You should check that yourself.
Simpler solution using properties of delta
Alternatively, we can observe that $f \, \delta_\xi = f(\xi) \, \delta_\xi$ holds for any continuous function $f$ and that $\left\langle T * \delta_\xi, \; \varphi(x) \right\rangle = \left\langle T, \; \varphi(x - \xi) \right\rangle$ holds for any distribution $T$. Specifically, it is true that $\delta_\xi * \delta_\zeta = \delta_{\xi + \zeta}$. Then the solution can be found by application of these rules. $$ f \, \delta_\xi \; * \; g \, \delta_\zeta \;=\; f(\xi) \, \delta_\xi \; * \; g(\zeta) \, \delta_\zeta \;=\; f(\xi) \; g(\zeta) \; \delta_{\xi + \zeta} $$