If I am given the equations of sides of a triangle and I need to find incentre what is the shortest method ? Is it possible without having to find lengths of sides of triangle?
2026-04-24 03:46:09.1777002369
Coordinates of incentre without finding side lengths
154 Views Asked by user220382 https://math.techqa.club/user/user220382/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ANALYTIC-GEOMETRY
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
- Surface by revolution
- All possible values of coordinate k such that triangle ABC is a right triangle?
- Triangle inside triangle
- Is there an equation to describe regular polytopes?
- How do I prove that the gradient between a fixed and any general point on a given line is $m$?
- Three-Dimensional coordinate system
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Suppose you are given an equation of a line $l$ (in the plane) \begin{equation*} ax+by+c=0~, \quad (a,b)\neq(0,0)\,. \end{equation*} For the task you have ahead of you it is best to divide the equation by $\pm d$, where $d=\sqrt{a^2+b^2}$, obtaining one of the two of its normalized forms \begin{equation*} \pm\,\frac{a}{d}x \,\pm\, \frac{b}{d}y \,\pm\, \frac{c}{d} \,=\, 0~. \end{equation*} Here $u:=\pm(a,b)/d$ is the unit vector orthogonal to the line $l$. Writing $e:=\pm c/d$ and $X:=(x,y)$, we rewrite the normalized equation of the line as \begin{equation*} u\cdot X +\, e \,=\, 0~, \end{equation*} where $u\cdot X$ is the usual scalar product (a.k.a. the dot product) of pairs of real numbers: $(a_1,a_2)\cdot(b_1,b_2):=a_1b_1+a_2b_2$. For any point $X$ in the plane the value of $u\!\cdot\!X+e$ is the signed distance of the point $X$ from the line $l$, positive on the side of the line to which the vector $u$ points, and negative on the opposite side.
Now to your problem. You are given the equations of the sides of a triangle. First thing you do, you determine the coordinates of the triangle's vertices $A$, $B$, $C$ by solving three systems of two linear equations in two unknowns (the coordinates of the vertex). Next, you obtain the normalized equations of the sides: \begin{align*} u\cdot X +\, d &\,=\, 0 \qquad \text{$\,$(side $B\lor C\,$)}~, \\ v\cdot X +\, e &\,=\, 0 \qquad \text{$\,$(side $C\lor A\,$)}~, \\ w\cdot X +\, f &\,=\, 0 \qquad \text{$\,$(side $A\lor B\,$)}~, \end{align*} where the unit normals $u$, $v$, $w$ point towards the triangle; you achive this by multiplying each linear form measuring the distance from a tringle's side by a factor $\pm1$ chosen so that the vertex opposite to the side will have a positive distance from it. As next to the last step you write down the equations of two of the three internal angle bisectors, say of the bisectors $l_A$ and $l_B$:
(here it is important that the vectors $v$ and $w$ are of the same length); similarly the bisector $l_B$ is the line that passes through the point $B$ and has the direction vector $w+u$. This is easier to do than it seems: the equations of the bisectors are \begin{align*} l_A\,&:\quad~\mspace{1mu} v\cdot X +\, e \,=\, w\cdot X +\, f ~, \\ l_B\,&:\quad w\cdot X +\, f \,=\, u\cdot X +\, e ~. \end{align*} Indeed, the first equation says that $l_A$ is the set of all points $X$ that are at the same distance from the side $C\lor A$ as from the side $A\lor B$, and the equation for $l_B$ is similarly intepreted. (Here it is important that the signed distances have correct signs).
Finally you solve the system of the two equations for the bisectors $l_A$ and $l_B$, obtaining the coordinates of the incenter $I$.
Remark. $~$The line passing through the vertex $A$ with the direction vector $w-v$ is the bisector $l'_{\!A}$ of the external angle at $A$, whose equation is \begin{equation*} l'_{\!A}\,:\quad~\mspace{1mu} v\cdot X +\, e \,=\, -(w\cdot X +\, f) ~; \end{equation*} the equation of the bisector $l'_B$ of the external angle at $B$ is obtained analogously. With the bisectors of both the internal and the external angles at the vertices $A$ and $B$ in hand you can compute the coordinates of the three triangle's excenters.
Remark. $~$According to the recipe above we have to calculate the coordinates of the triangle's vertices just because we need them to choose correct signs of the linear forms measuring the distances of a point from the triangle's sides. Actually this is unnecessary: we can choose properly aligned signs of the vectors $u$, $v$, $w$ straightaway, without involving the triangle's vertices.
Here is how. For any two pairs of real numbers $x=(x_1,x_2)$, $y=(\smash{y}_1,\smash{y}_2)$ we define $[x,y] := x_1\smash{y}_2-x_2\smash{y}_1$. Initially we determine the unit normals $u$, $v$, $w$ of the triangle's sides without caring about the signs. Then we look at the numbers $[u,v]$, $[v,w]$, and $[w,u]$. If they are all of the same sign, then all three vectors $u$, $v$, $w$ point towards the triangle or all three point away from the triangle (which is equally good). If the three numbers are not of the same sign, then we flip the sign of one of the three vectors: if, say, $[u,v]$ and $[v,w]$ are negative and $[w,u]$ is positive, we replace $v$ by $v_1=-v$ and then have all three numbers $[u,v_1]$, $[v_1,w]$, and $[w,u]$ positive.