$\sum_{i=1}^n e^{a_i}$ (where $a_i \in \mathbb R$) is expensive for large $n$ (a sum and $n$ exponential operations). I was wondering if there is any way for simplifying this?
2026-04-12 12:37:15.1775997435
Could $\sum e^{a_i}$ be simplified? Does it have an identity?
93 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SUMMATION
- Computing:$\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{3^n}{n!(n+3)}$
- Prove that $1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+...}}}}=\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+...}}}}$
- Fourier series. Find the sum $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2n+1}$
- Sigma (sum) Problem
- How to prove the inequality $\frac{1}{n}+\frac{1}{n+1}+\cdots+\frac{1}{2n-1}\geq \log (2)$?
- Double-exponential sum (maybe it telescopes?)
- Simplify $\prod_{k=1}^{l} \sum_{r=d}^m {{m}\choose{r}} \left(N-k \right)^{r} k^{m-r+1}$
- Sum of two martingales
- How can we prove that $e^{-jωn}$ converges at $0$ while n -> infinity?
- Interesting inequalities
Related Questions in EXPONENTIATION
- exponential equation with different bases; no logarithms
- Is square root of $y^2$ for every $y>0,y\in\mathbb{R}$?
- Definite sum for $(1+a)^n$
- Fractional exponents definition and the additive law of exponents
- Fourth term in the expansion of $(1-2x)^{3/2}$
- Why is $\int_{0}^{t} e^{nt} \mathrm{\ dt} = \frac{1}{n} \left(e^{nt} - 1\right)$? [solved; notation is also faulty in the first place]
- Exponentiation property of the modulo operator
- When are $\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^c$ and $\frac{a^c}{b^c}$ equivalent?
- How can I rewrite expression to get log out of exponent
- Compare $2^{2016}$ and $10^{605}$ without a calculator
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
One possible way to reduce the cost of the exponentiation operation may be to replace exponentiation involving large exponents with multiplications. This is what I mean:
Assume that $\{a_i\}$ is sorted in ascending order (if not, sort them first), so that $a_{i+1}\geq a_i$. Now, let's use the notation $$ A(n) = \sum_{i=1}^n e^{a_i} $$ Obviously, $A(1)=e^{a_1}$. Now, we can write $$ A(2)=A(1)+e^{a_2} $$ But we could also write this as $$ A(2) = A(1)+b_1e^{a_2-a_1} $$ where $b_1=e^{a_1}$. Similarly, we have $$ A(3)=A(2)+b_2e^{a_3-a_2} $$ where $b_2=e^{a_2}=b_1e^{a_2-a_1}$. If we define the sequence $$ b_{i+1} = e^{a_{i+1}-a_i}b_i $$ with $b_1=e^{a_1}$, then we can write $$ A(n+1)=A(n)+b_{n+1} $$ The advantage of this is that, while $a_n$ may be very large, and thus require a lot of computation, it may be much quicker to calculate the various $b_i$. It requires just as many exponentiation operations, but reduces the size of the exponent significantly, which may save on operation cost.
However, it is subject to the exponentiation cost relationship. If the cost of exponentiation remains almost constant with size of the exponent, then this will actually be slower than simply evaluating the exponentials directly, due to the added multiplications.