Suppose the diagonal functor $\Delta:\mathcal{C}\to\mathcal{C}^J$ admits both left and right adjoints. How would I describe the units and counits of these adjunctions.
2026-04-18 08:38:33.1776501513
Counit and Unit to an adjunction
308 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Start with the definition of $\Delta:\mathcal{C}\to\mathcal{C}^J$. This functor takes $c\in \mathcal C$ to the constant functor $\Delta_c:J\to \mathcal C$ (where $\Delta_c(j)=c$ and $\Delta_c(j\overset{f}\to j')=c\overset{1_c}\to c$), and arrows $c\overset{f}\to c'$ to $\Delta_c\overset{\Delta f}\to \Delta_{c'}$, where $\Delta f$ is the natural transformation defined by $\Delta f(i)=f$.
If $\mathcal C$ has small limits, then a good candidate for the right adjoint to $\Delta$ would be $\underset{\leftarrow}\lim:\mathcal C^J\to \mathcal C$ where this functor sends a diagram $D$ in $\mathcal C^J$ to its limit object $d\in \mathcal C.$ Of course, this entails a limit cone $(d,\lambda_i)$ where the $(\lambda_i)$ are arrows from $d$ to $D_i$ that commute with $d_{ij}:D(i)\to D(j).$ On arrows, $\underset{\leftarrow}\lim$ sends natural transformations $\tau:D\to D'$ to the unique arrow $\phi:d\to d'$ that satisfies $\lambda_i\circ \phi=\lambda'_{i}$ for all $i\in J$.
To check that $\Delta\dashv \underset{\leftarrow}\lim$, we look for a natural isomorphism of $\textit{sets},\ \hom(\Delta_ c, D)\leftrightarrow \hom(c,\underset{\leftarrow}\lim D).$
But this is just a matter of interpreting the definitions: an element of the hom set on the left hand side is a natural transformation $\tau$ from $\Delta_c$ to $D$, but by definition of $\Delta,\ \tau$ is nothing more that a cone from $c$ to $D$. And now, by definition of the limit, there corresponds exactly one arrow from $c$ to $\underset{\leftarrow}\lim D$ that satisfies the UMP of the limit. And this is the element of the hom set on the right hand side that we send this cone to. It is routine now to check that this correspondence gives the isomorphism we want.
To find the counit, $\varepsilon_D$ we look for the arrow $\Delta\circ \underset{\leftarrow}\lim D\to D$ that corresponds to the identity arrow in $\text {hom}(\underset{\leftarrow}\lim D,\underset{\leftarrow}\lim D).$ But, the cone from $\underset{\leftarrow}\lim D$ to $D$ that gets sent to the identity arrow in $\hom(\underset{\leftarrow}\lim D,\underset{\leftarrow}\lim D)$ is the limit cone itself so $\varepsilon_D$ is the (natural transfomation defined by) the limit cone.
The unit $\eta,$ of the adjunction is given by $\eta_c:c\to \underset{\leftarrow}\lim \circ \Delta_c=c\times c$ that corresponds to the identity arrow in $\hom(\Delta_c,\Delta_c).$
That the left adjoint to $\Delta$ is the colimit functor is proved in the same way.