Concerning finite field extensions, with $E_1E_2$ the compositum:
I proved $$[E_1E_2:K]=[E_1E_2:E_2] \cdot [E_2:K] \leq [E_1:K] \cdot [E_2:K]$$ Is it true that $[E_1E_2:K]$ has to divide $ [E_1:K] \cdot [E_2:K]$? Or is there a counterexample?
I proved that $E_1E_2$ is normal over $K$ if $E_1$ and $E_2$ are. I assume the other way around does not necessarily have to be true, does anyone know a counterexample?
I proved that Gal $(E_1E_2/K)$ is abelian if Gal $(E_1/K)$ and Gal $(E_2/K)$ are abelian by defining the following injective homomorhpism.
$$\Phi : \textrm{Gal}(E_1E_2/K) \to \textrm{Gal}(E_1/K) \times \textrm{Gal}(E_2/K)$$ $$\sigma \mapsto (\sigma|_{E_1},\sigma|_{E_2})$$
I assume the other way around does not necessarily have to be true, does anyone know a counterexample?
Rene's answer provides a counterexample to the first two, with $E_1=\Bbb Q(\sqrt[3]{2})$, $E_2=\Bbb Q(\zeta_3\sqrt[3]{2})$.
The third is true, because $G(E_1/K)$ and $G(E_2/K)$ are quotients of $G(E_1E_2/K)$.