If X is any uniformizable topological space, then we can show that there exists a finest covering uniformity on X by taking the union of all covering uniformities compatible with the topology of X. We know that this finest uniformity is a normal family. How to show that this finest uniformity is compatible with the topology of X?
2026-02-23 18:56:48.1771873008
Covering uniformity (Topology)
254 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in UNIFORM-SPACES
- Is $\approx$ actually an entourage?
- What is the hausdorff completion of this uniform structure on the real line?
- Completeness of Continuous Functions on Uniform Spaces
- What is the relation between chain connected with connected in uniform space?
- Is there a version of closing lemma in the case of uniform space?
- Closure of $A$ with respect to uniform topology
- The interior of the elements of a uniform structure $D$ is also base for $D$
- Why are compact Hausdorff spaces divisible - and other uniformity related questions
- Question about totally disconnected compact uniform space
- totally disconnected compact Hausdorff uniform space
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Suppose we have a uniformisable space $(X,\mathcal{T}_X)$. Let $\mathcal{C}(X)$ be the set of all possible covering uniformities on the set $X$. For a covering uniformity $\mu$ let $\mathcal{T}_\mu$ denote its induced topology on $X$.
Define $$\mathcal{M} = \{\mu \in \mathcal{C}(X): \mathcal{T}_\mu = \mathcal{T}_X\}$$
Then $\mathcal{M}$ is non-empty (as $\mathcal{T}_X$ is uniformisable), and is a normal family as a union of normal families. It is not necessarily a uniformity, but it is, like all normal families, a so-called subbase for a uniformity, the so-called "fine uniformity", $\mu_f$. This means that
$$\mathcal{U} \in \mu_f \Leftrightarrow \exists n \in \mathbb{N}: \forall i \le n : \exists \mu_i \in \mathcal{M} \exists \mathcal{U}_i \in \mu_i: \bigwedge_{i=1}^n \mathcal{U_i} \prec \mathcal{U}$$
In words: all covers that are refined by a meet of finitely many covers from $\mathcal{M}$. This is a uniformity (quite easy to check) that contains all of $\mathcal{M}$ and it is the smallest such uniformity.
The claim is that $\mathcal{T}_{\mu_f} = \mathcal{T}_X$. The interesting inclusion is from left to right:
Suppose $O$ is open in the topology induced by $\mu_f$. Let $x \in O$. Then by definition there is some $\mathcal{U} \in \mu_f$ such that $St(x,\mathcal{U}) \subseteq O$.
Find the $\mu_i \in \mathcal{M}$ and $\mathcal{U}_i \in \mu_i$, $i=1\ldots n$, as stated above.
But then
$$\bigcap_{i=1}^n St(x, \mathcal{U}_i) = St(x, \bigwedge_{i=1}^n \mathcal{U}_i) \subseteq St(x, \mathcal{U}) \subseteq O $$
And as all sets $St(x, \mathcal{U}_i)$ are in a generating set for $\mathcal{T}_X$ (from $\mu_i \in \mathcal{M}$) this shows that $x$ is an interior point for $O$ in $\mathcal{T}_X$. As this holds for all $x \in O$, $O \in \mathcal{T}_X$ as required. Right to left is trivial: Find a uniformity $\mu$ such that $\mathcal{T}_\mu = \mathcal{T}_X$. So $\mu \in \mathcal{M}$ so all sets $St(x, \mathcal{U})$ for $\mathcal{U} \in \mu$ are also in the generating set for $\mu_f$, as $\mu \subset \mu_f$, so $\mathcal{T}_X = \mathcal{T}_\mu \subseteq \mathcal{T}_{\mu_f}$, as required.