It is a standard result that on a domain $\Omega$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$, $T=\sum_{|I|=q}T_{I}dx_{I}$ for any $q$-current $T$, where $T_{I}$ is a $0$ current or a distribution on $\Omega$ for each multi-index $I$. Now, for an $r$-current $T$ and an $s$-form $\alpha$ on $\Omega$, define an $r+s$-current as $(T\wedge\alpha)(\beta)=T(\alpha\wedge\beta)$ for any $n-r-s$-form $\beta$ on $\Omega$. Then, in the above we have $T=\sum_{|I|=q}T_{I}\wedge dx_{I}$ on $\Omega$. At this stage, if we start with a general smooth manifold $M$(orientable) and a $q$-current $T$ on $M$, can we write $T=\sum_{\alpha}T_{\alpha}\wedge\omega_{\alpha}$ on $M~?$ (Here $T_{\alpha}$ and $\omega_{\alpha}$ are distributions and $q$-forms on $M$ for each $\alpha$).
2026-04-01 03:39:36.1775014776
Current being a differential form with distribution coefficients
616 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in DISTRIBUTION-THEORY
- $\lim_{n\to\infty}n^2(\int_{-1/n}^0u(x-s)ds -\int_0^{1/n}u(x-s)ds)$ where $u(x)$ an infinitely differentiable function on R
- Approximating derivative of Dirac delta function using mollifiers
- Distributional solution of differential equation
- Solution of partiell differential equation using the fundamental solution
- Find a sequence converging in distribution but not weakly
- How to prove this Dirac delta limit representation is correct?
- Properties about Dirac Delta derivative
- Does $\mathrm{e}^x$ belong to $\mathcal{S}'(\mathbb{R}^n)$?
- Is there a sense in which this limit is zero?
- Schwartz kernel theorem and dual topologies
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-FORMS
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- Relation between Fubini-Study metric and curvature
- Integration of one-form
- Time derivative of a pullback of a time-dependent 2-form
- Elliptic Curve and Differential Form Determine Weierstrass Equation
- I want the pullback of a non-closed 1-form to be closed. Is that possible?
- How to find 1-form for Stokes' Theorem?
- Verify the statement about external derivative.
- Understanding time-dependent forms
- form value on a vector field
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The answer is mostly yes, although you may need to be careful with non-compact manifolds.
First look at the case of a compact manifold. Cover $M$ with a finite number of coordinate charts $\phi_i: U_i \to M$ and take a subordinate partition $\psi_i$ of $1$, so that $\sum_i \psi_i = 1$ and $\mathop{supp} \psi_i \subset \subset\phi_i(U_i)$. Now on each chart you can use the pushforward to consider $S_i := (\phi_i^{-1})_* (T \wedge \psi_i)$ as a current with compact support on $U_i \subset \mathbb{R}^n$. So apply your standard result on $S_i$ to get $S_i = \sum_I S_{i,I} dx_I$ and push this back to $M$, in order to get $$T \wedge \psi_i = \sum_I \underbrace{(\phi_i)_* S_{i,I}}_{T_{i,I}} \underbrace{(\phi_i)_* dx_I}_{\omega_{i,I}}$$ Sum over $i$ to get the result. (You may need to cut of the $\omega_{i,I}$ outside of $\mathop{supp} \psi_i$ to guarantee smoothness, but I'll leave that to you)
For a non-compact manifold you can only choose a locally finite cover, so either your sum will be infinite or you will have to combine non-overlapping coordinate charts somehow, I vaguely remember that this can be done.
You can probably also try to take a different route, I think the main condition is finding $\omega_a$ such that they span the space of all $q$-forms in each point. If you have those than you can probably proceed similarly to the original proof.