I want to write an expression for $d\langle\alpha,\beta\rangle$ where $\alpha,\beta$ are two $k$ forms on a closed Riemannian manifold say $M$. Now I would want to write something like \begin{align*} d\langle\alpha,\beta\rangle=\langle d\alpha,\beta\rangle+\langle\alpha,d\beta\rangle \end{align*} But it won't be right as $d\alpha$ and $d\beta$ would become $k+1$ forms and also the end product should be a $1$-form. What should be the correct expression and the interpretation for that? Here the inner product is the usual inner product on forms using Hodge-star operator.
2026-04-20 20:50:13.1776718213
$d\langle \alpha,\beta\rangle$ for two $k$ forms $\alpha,\beta$ on a manifold
133 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-FORMS
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- Relation between Fubini-Study metric and curvature
- Integration of one-form
- Time derivative of a pullback of a time-dependent 2-form
- Elliptic Curve and Differential Form Determine Weierstrass Equation
- I want the pullback of a non-closed 1-form to be closed. Is that possible?
- How to find 1-form for Stokes' Theorem?
- Verify the statement about external derivative.
- Understanding time-dependent forms
- form value on a vector field
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Here's a direct calculation.
$$\langle \alpha, \beta\rangle = g^{i_1j_1} \cdots g^{i_kj_k} \alpha_{i_1\cdots i_k} \beta_{j_1\cdots j_k}$$
Assuming that the calculation is the center of a normal coordinates,
\begin{align} \partial_i \langle \alpha, \beta\rangle &= \partial_i \alpha_{i_1\cdots i_k} \ \beta_{i_1\cdots i_k} + \alpha_{i_1\cdots i_k}\ \partial_i \beta_{i_1\cdots i_k}\\ &= \nabla_i \alpha_{i_1\cdots i_k} \ \beta_{i_1\cdots i_k} + \alpha_{i_1\cdots i_k}\ \nabla_i \beta_{i_1\cdots i_k} \end{align}
where $\nabla \alpha$ is the covariant differentiation of $\alpha$, which is a $(0,k+1)$-tensor (which might not be a $(k+1)$-form). Formally one can still write
$$d\langle \alpha, \beta\rangle = \langle \nabla \alpha, \beta \rangle+ \langle \nabla \beta, \alpha\rangle$$
if by the inner product one refers to
$$\langle \nabla \alpha, \beta \rangle = C ( \nabla \alpha \otimes \beta^\sharp),$$
where $(\beta^\sharp)^{j_1\cdots j_k} = g^{i_1j_1}\cdots g^{i_kj_k} \beta_{i_1\cdots i_k}$ and $C$ is some contraction.
I guess it is not possible that $d\langle \alpha, \beta\rangle$ depends only on $\alpha, d\alpha, \beta , d\beta$ but not the full derivative $\nabla \alpha, \nabla \beta$: For example, if $\alpha$ is closed, there are cases where $\|\alpha\|^2$ is non-constant, so $d\langle \alpha, \alpha\rangle$ should be a non-zero one form.