We know Goldbach's_conjecture. It concerns even numbers. However even numbers have many subsets.
My questions concern decomposition of specifically a number $2^k$ into a sum of two primes:
- Is $2^k$ always decomposable into a sum of two primes $p_1$ and $ p_2$ when $k>2$?
- How to prove that?
(so far there is no proof for set of all even numbers, maybe there is for a some specific subset?)
(the third question at the end of the text)
I've prepared a small program for SymPy in order to check that and collected results in the table below.
Observe listed the sequence of the least prime numbers with property that when added to other prime number gives $2^k$
i.e. $2^k=p_1+p_2$.
($p_1$ - it is listed in the second column - in the first column $k$ is listed, in the third one a number of loops till prime is reached (see program below) is listed
so we have $2^3=3+5, \ 2^4=3+13, \ \dots \ 2^7=19+109 \ $, ... etc..)
$\begin{bmatrix} 3 & 3 & 1 \\ 4 & 3 & 1 \\ 5 & 3 & 1 \\ 6 & 3 & 1 \\ 7 & 19 & 2 \\ 8 & 5 & 1 \\ 9 & 3 & 1 \\ 10 & 3 & 1 \\ 11 & 19 & 2 \\ 12 & 3 & 1 \\ 13 & 13 & 1 \\ 14 & 3 & 1 \\ 15 & 19 & 1 \\ 16 & 17 & 2 \\ 17 & 13 & 2 \\ 18 & 5 & 1 \\ 19 & 19 & 1 \\ 20 & 3 & 1 \\ 21 & 19 & 2 \\ 22 & 3 & 1 \\ 23 & 37 & 4 \\ 24 & 3 & 1 \\ 25 & 61 & 3 \\ 26 & 5 & 1 \\ 27 & 79 & 2 \\ 28 & 89 & 2 \\ 29 & 3 & 1 \\ 30 & 41 & 2 \\ 31 & 19 & 1 \\ 32 & 5 & 1 \\ 33 & 79 & 4 \\ 34 & 41 & 1 \\ 35 & 31 & 1 \\ 36 & 5 & 1 \\ 37 & 31 & 2 \\ 38 & 107 & 3 \\ 39 & 7 & 1 \\ 40 & 167 & 2 \\ 41 & 31 & 2 \\ 42 & 11 & 1 \\ 43 & 67 & 2 \\ 44 & 17 & 1 \\ 45 & 139 & 7 \\ 46 & 167 & 5 \\ 47 & 127 & 2 \\ 48 & 59 & 1 \\ 49 & 139 & 4 \\ 50 & 71 & 4 \\ 51 & 139 & 2 \\ 52 & 47 & 1 \\ 53 & 379 & 9 \\ 54 & 53 & 2 \\ 55 & 67 & 2 \\ 56 & 5 & 1 \\ 57 & 13 & 1 \\ 58 & 137 & 4 \\ 59 & 607 & 6 \\ 60 & 107 & 2 \\ 61 & 31 & 1 \\ 62 & 167 & 6 \\ \end{bmatrix}$
The sequence was obtained with the program (I believe it acts properly)
for k in range(3, 63):
diff=0
delta=2
level =0
while isprime(diff)==False:
level=level+1
p= prevprime(2**k-delta)
diff= (2**k)-p
if isprime(diff)==False:
delta=diff
else:
break
print "%d & %d & %d \\\\ " % (k, diff, level)
Additionally although the reference numbers $2^k$ are quite big the mentioned least prime numbers $p_1$ are rather small, probably the pattern is continuing for bigger $k$ ..
- Can we say something about upper bound for such numbers ? Does some $2^m$, where $m=f(k)$, limit them?
The following PARI/GP program shows the first $300$ numbers (The first two lines show the self-defined function) Remark : For the sake of speed, I only applied the BPSW-test, which is very reliable.
If we define $$r:=\frac{\ln(p)}{\ln(m)}$$ where $p$ is the smallest prime doing the job and $m$ the exponent in the power of $2$, then the hard cases ($r> 1.5$) upto $m=1\ 000$ are :