So, it comes in two parts:
a. Prove that $\sim$ is an equivalence relation on ℝ².
b. Give a geometric description of the partition of ℝ² formed by the equivalence classes.
For a, I have to prove that $\sim$ is reflexive, transitive, and symmetric. So, for reflexive, can I say, let $a$ be in ℝ². Then, $a \sim a$ because $a+a = a+a$?
For symmetric, can I say: assume $x,y,w,z$ are in ℝ² and that $x+y~w+z$. Then, by definition $x+y=w+z$. So, if we multiply by $1$, we get $y+x=z+w$?
I'm not sure how to set up transitive.
Also, can someone help me with the partitions as well?
IMHO the best way to begin an equivalence relation question is to see if you can informally convince yourself that the relation is an equivalence. If you can describe the meaning of the relation using the word "same" then you can be reasonably sure that it is an equivalence relation. For example:
Then you should do the question formally by showing that the relation is reflexive, symmetric and transitive.
Your proof for reflexivity is not good because you are adding pairs of numbers, whereas the definition of the relation says that you should add the components of the pairs. Try this.
For transitivity, try to fill in the gaps in the following proof.
The equivalence class of a pair $(a,b)$ is by definition $$\{\,(x,y)\in\Bbb R^2\mid(x,y)\sim(a,b)\,\}\ ,$$ that is, $$\{\,(x,y)\in\Bbb R^2\mid x+y=a+b\,\}\ .$$ If $a,b$ are fixed numbers, what does this set look like geometrically? If you vary $a$ and/or $b$, can you describe all the equivalence classes you get?
Good luck!