I've been trying to find a definition of two matroids being equal. I would have thought two matroids are equal iff their ground sets and independent sets are equal. However, online I found out that two matroids are equal iff their ground sets have the same size/cardinality and their independent sets are equal (the definition here says indexed bases). This is the only definition I can find for two matroids being equal, and I just wanted to verify that other people use this definition. It's not defined in the index of Oxley's book as well as the other book I use which I predominantly use which is why I just wanted to double check to see if this is the definition everyone uses.
2026-03-25 02:57:22.1774407442
Definition: Matroids being Equal
96 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MATROIDS
- Do these special substring sets form a matroid?
- how to prove that the dual of a matroid satisfies the exchange property?
- Proof of uniform matrix being transversal matrix by selecting singletons
- Smallest matroid containing two disjoint maximal elements of cardinality $K$?
- How much does the number of connected components of a graph grow in the case below?
- Given bases $A$, $B$ of a matroid there is a one-to-one mapping $\omega$ from $A$ to $B$ such that $(A - {a}) \cup {\omega(a)}$ is independent
- How to list all circuits of an oriented matroid and all circuits of its contraction of a vertex by hand?
- Relationship between Affine Dependence and Linear Dependence in Oriented Matroids?
- Contraction of oriented matroid as related to polytope?
- Why is this not a matroid?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I'm fairly sure that two matroids cannot be equal in the strictest sense if their ground sets are different. However, the whole point of matroids are that the particular elements of the ground set don't actually play a role; we don't care about matroid equality, we care about matroid isomorphism.
I think that this distinction between equality and isomorphism is best understood in the context of matroid intersections. If the ground sets are different but the matroids are isomorphic you can't perform a meaningful intersection. See the link below.
https://theory.stanford.edu/~jvondrak/CS369P/lec10.pdf