Definitions of a geometric algebra/exterior algebra

95 Views Asked by At

I'm interested in exterior algebra and similar topics and I'm reading this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_algebra#Definition_and_notation I've got two questions:

  1. Do you assess this definition is formally correct? In my opinion: it's not. In particular $\mathcal{G}(p,q)$ in $A, B, C\in \mathcal{G}(p,q)$ is another $\mathcal{G}(p,q)$ than $\mathcal{G}(p,q)$ in $AB \in \mathcal{G}(p,q)$ isn't it? But the "definition" doesn't explain what set $AB$ belongs to and hence it loops. The definition also doesn't say what the codomain of $g$.
  2. Where the second equation in $$\frac{1}{2}(ab + ba) = \frac{1}{2}\left((a + b)^2 - a^2 - b^2\right) = a \cdot b$$ comes from?
1

There are 1 best solutions below

11
On
  1. a) Do you assess the definition is formally correct?

Yes, it's fine. It just says "the exterior algebra is the Clifford algebra with the zero bilinear form."

  1. b) In particular $\mathcal{G}(p,q)$ in $A, B, C\in \mathcal{G}(p,q)$ is another $\mathcal{G}(p,q)$ than $\mathcal{G}(p,q)$ in $AB \in \mathcal{G}(p,q)$ isn't it? But the "definition" doesn't explain what set $$ belongs to and hence it loops.

I have no idea what that means. The only place I see $AB$ is in the list of properties (I hope you didn't take that to be a definition. It seems you may have.) And that one place seems to say exactly what set $AB$ belongs to, and you seem to have typed it no less than 5 times above... I don't think any looping is involved because there isn't really any defining going on at that point.

  1. c) The definition also doesn't say what the codomain of $$.

It's true it doesn't explicitly say it here, but a "bilinear form $g$ on $F$ vector space $V$" means a function $g:V\times V\to F$ with special properties.

  1. Where the second equation in [...] comes from? [sic]

For vectors $a,b$ and a bilinear form $B$ for a field that's not characteristic $2$, there is always a way to separate $B$ into symmetric and antisymmetric pieces. That's what that equation is doing. Actually, this is something that is done more generally for tensors, and a bilinear form is just an example of a $2$ tensor.

In this particular case you can just verify it using basic algebra. There is not much to say about the equation.