Given graph degree sequence . What is the condition that it can be degree sequence of connected graph. Can anyone please share link to theorem?
Degree sequence of connected graphs
3.4k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail AtThere are 2 best solutions below
On
Recently, there has been some new research on this problem. Delen and Cangul defined a new invariant for graphs (and degree sequences) called omega invariant which helps to determine many properties of all the realizations of a given degree sequence including connectedness, realizability, cyclicness, number of loops, multiple edges, chords, maximum cycle length etc., see [Delen, S., Cangul, I. N., A New Graph Invariant, Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory, 6 (1), (2018), 30-33 DOI: 10.12691/tjant-6-1-4] for the definition and fundamental properties and [212) Delen, S., Cangul, I. N., Extremal Problems on Components and Loops in Graphs, Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series, 35 (2) (2019), 161-171, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10114-018-8086-6, WOS:000458139300011 (https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10114-018-8086-6.pdf)] for some properties. Some results are as follows: If omega of a degree sequence is less than or equal to -4, all realizations of it must be disconnected. If omega is at least -2, then the realizations could be connected or disconnected (that is, DS is potentially connected). If omega = -2, then every connected realization must be acyclic (tree).If omega is non-negative, all realizations are cyclic, etc...
This new invariant also helps to prove many existing results like Edmonds' theorem.
Note that there are two notions here which should be distinguished: potentially and forcibly realizable sequences.
Let $d=(d_1,\ d_2,\ \cdots,\ d_n)$ be a degree sequence, increasingly ordered $$d_1 \le d_2 \le \cdots \le d_n$$
We say that $G$ is a realization of $d$ if the degree sequence of $G$ is equal to $d$.
We say that $d$ is forcibly connected if every realization of $d$ is connected.
We say that $d$ is potentially connected if there exists a realization of $d$ which is connected.
Analogous definitions hold for any property $P$ of graphs, in which we say that a sequence $d$ is potentially/forcibly $P$-realizable if some/every realization of $d$ satisfies $P$. There are some beautiful results related to such sequences. Regarding connectivity, here are some of the basic results.
Theorem 1 (Bondy and Boesch): Let $d=(d_1,\ \cdots,\ d_n)$ be a degree sequence. Let $k$ be an integer such that $1\le k \le n-1$. If $$d_i \le i + k - 2 \implies d_{n-k+1} \ge n-i$$ for $1 \le i \le \left\lfloor \frac{n-k+1}{2}\right\rfloor$, then $d$ is forcibly $k$-connected.
Theorem 2 (Bauer, Hakimi, Kahl, Schmeichel): Let $d=(d_1,\ \cdots,\ d_n)$ be a degree sequence. Let $\lambda \ge 1$ be an integer. If $d_1 \ge \lambda$ and $$d_{i-\lambda+1} \le i - 1 \land d_i \le i +\lambda -2 \implies d_n \ge n-i+\lambda-1$$ for $\lambda+1 \le i \le \left\lfloor\frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor$, then $d$ is forcibly $\lambda$-edge-connected.
Theorem 3: Let $d = (d_1,\ \cdots,\ d_n)$ be a degree sequence. Then $d$ is potentially connected if and only if $d_1 \ge 1$ and $$\sum_{i=1}^nd_i \ge 2(n-1)$$
Theorem 4 (Edmonds): Let $d = (d_1,\ \cdots,\ d_n)$ be a degree sequence. Then $d$ is potentially $\lambda$-edge-connected ($\lambda \ge 2$) if and only if $d_1 \ge \lambda$.
Theorem 5 (Wang & Kleitman): Let $d = (d_1,\ \cdots,\ d_n)$ be a degree sequence. Then $d$ is potentially $k$-connected ($k\ge 2$) if and only if $d_1 \ge k$ and $$\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^n d_i - \sum_{i=n-k}^n d_i + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)}{2} \ge n-k$$
There is also an interesting result regarding degree sets, i.e. the multiplicities of the terms are not specified.
Theorem 6 (Kapoor, Polimeni & Wall): Let $S=\{s_1,\ \cdots,\ s_k\}$ be a set of positive integers. Then $S$ is realizable as the degree set of a connected graph. Moreover, we may take the order of the graph to be $M+1$ where $M$ is the largest member of $S$.
References (by theorem number):
1 and 2: Bauer, Hakimi, Kahl, Schmeichel. Sufficient Degree Conditions for $k$-Edge-Connectedness of a Graph.
3: Berge, Graphs and Hypergraphs. The result is not too difficult to prove using induction. There are quite a few other interesting results given in Berge's book. Especially relevant are sections of chapters 6 and 9.
4: Edmonds, Existence of $k$-edge-connected ordinary graphs with prescribed degrees.
5: Wang, Kleitman. On the existence of N-connected graphs with prescribed degrees ($n \ge 2$).
6: Kapoor, Polimeni, Wall. Degree sets for graphs, Fund. Math. 95 (1977) 189–194.