My mathematical class task is to de-noise a function using wavelet transform. I am to select a function $f(x)$ and noise function with zero-mean $n(x)$. I am to add noise like this: $$f_{noise}(x) = f(x) + \epsilon n(x)$$ The thing is, I should perform de-noising process not just by using thresholding or a similar technique, but taking into account the available information about the noise function. If I were to do de-noising using Foruier transform, I would null frequencies corresponding to noise function, but wavelets are different since detailing coefficients aren't actually frequencies, so I fail to come up with a solution. So, my question is: how to denoise a function with wavelet transform relying on the fact that $n(x)$ is known?
2026-03-25 14:18:42.1774448322
Denoise using wavelet transform
213 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FOURIER-ANALYSIS
- An estimate in the introduction of the Hilbert transform in Grafakos's Classical Fourier Analysis
- Verifying that translation by $h$ in time is the same as modulating by $-h$ in frequency (Fourier Analysis)
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Understanding Book Proof that $[-2 \pi i x f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) = {d \over d\xi} \widehat{f}(\xi)$
- Proving the sharper form of the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem
- Exercise $10$ of Chapter $4$ in Fourier Analysis by Stein & Shakarchi
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
Related Questions in WAVELETS
- Power spectrum of field over an arbitrarily-shaped country
- Are there analogues to orthogonal transformations in non-orientable surfaces?
- Can anyone please tell me how to calculate discrete wavelet transform of a derivatve?
- Orthogonality of Meyer Wavelets
- "There are no smooth, symmetric, compactly supported wavelets."
- analogue of Fourier transform where i is replaced by $sqrt{i}$
- Scaling function to form a multiresolution analysis
- Explicit formula of scaling coefficient for scaling function
- Is wavelet noise reduction just removing the higher frequency coefficients?
- Describe a signal presence in a time series
Related Questions in NOISE
- Information transmitting rate of a noisy discrete channel with Omission/Adding errors
- How do derive the statistical representation of white noise in the frequency domain.
- remove uniform distributed noise with 0 mean and j variance from my data
- Relationship between noise term ($\epsilon$) and MLE solution for Linear Regression Models.
- How to utilize the right-hand side in inverse problems
- Decision rule that minmize the probability of error
- Riemann integral of discrete white noise
- Is wavelet noise reduction just removing the higher frequency coefficients?
- Rotational diffusion in Brownian motion
- Interpolation with almost constant slope E
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I assume the signal is being sampled on a discrete set $\{ x_i \}$, say evenly spaced on $[0,1]$. Fix a model space $X$ for the signal $f$, e.g. Sobolev, Besov, etc.
Typically, one would perform a discrete wavelet transform (where the filter is given by some chosen wavelet basis for $X$) and threshold the wavelet coefficients using some criterion involving $\epsilon$. For example, hard thresholding means setting any wavelet coefficients $ < \epsilon$ to $0$. Then you invert the thresholded coefficients. This gives the estimate for $f$.
The mathematical and statistical justification of this procedure lies in the fact that