How do I show that the Newton's quotient is still valid for distribution? By this, I mean that if $u \in \mathcal{D}'(\mathbb{R})$ and if $u_r$ is the translation $\langle u_r,\phi \rangle = \langle u, \phi_{r}\rangle$ of $u$, in which $\phi_{-r}(x) = \phi(x+r)$ and $\phi \in \mathcal{C}_0^\infty$, then $$\lim_{r \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{r}(\langle u_r,\phi \rangle - \langle u,\phi \rangle) = \langle u,-\phi' \rangle.$$ By definition, we have that $\langle u',\phi \rangle = -\langle u,\phi' \rangle$. The problem for me is to show the convergence $\frac{\phi_{-r} - \phi}{r} \rightarrow -\phi'$ in $\mathcal{C}_0^\infty$, as $r \rightarrow 0$.
2026-03-30 08:05:48.1774857948
Derivative of a distribution in $\mathcal{D}'(\mathbb{R})$
74 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in FOURIER-ANALYSIS
- An estimate in the introduction of the Hilbert transform in Grafakos's Classical Fourier Analysis
- Verifying that translation by $h$ in time is the same as modulating by $-h$ in frequency (Fourier Analysis)
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Understanding Book Proof that $[-2 \pi i x f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) = {d \over d\xi} \widehat{f}(\xi)$
- Proving the sharper form of the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem
- Exercise $10$ of Chapter $4$ in Fourier Analysis by Stein & Shakarchi
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
Related Questions in DISTRIBUTION-THEORY
- $\lim_{n\to\infty}n^2(\int_{-1/n}^0u(x-s)ds -\int_0^{1/n}u(x-s)ds)$ where $u(x)$ an infinitely differentiable function on R
- Approximating derivative of Dirac delta function using mollifiers
- Distributional solution of differential equation
- Solution of partiell differential equation using the fundamental solution
- Find a sequence converging in distribution but not weakly
- How to prove this Dirac delta limit representation is correct?
- Properties about Dirac Delta derivative
- Does $\mathrm{e}^x$ belong to $\mathcal{S}'(\mathbb{R}^n)$?
- Is there a sense in which this limit is zero?
- Schwartz kernel theorem and dual topologies
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Take a sequence $r_n \to 0.$
Given $\phi \in C_c^\infty(\mathbb{R})$ let $\psi_n(x) = r_n^{-1}(\phi(x+r_n) - \phi(x)).$ It's obvious that $\psi_n \in C_c^\infty(\mathbb{R}).$
We want to show that $\psi_n \to \phi'$ in $C_c^\infty(\mathbb{R}).$ For this we must show two things:
Point 1 is easy. If $\operatorname{supp} \phi \subseteq [a, b]$ then $\operatorname{supp} \phi_n \subseteq [a-r_n, b-r_n] \subseteq [a-\sup_n r_n, b+\inf_n r_n]$ so all $\phi_n$ have their supports contained in one compact set.
For point 2 we use the mean value theorem. This says that $\phi(x+r_n) - \phi(x) = r_n \phi'(\xi_n)$ for some $\xi_n$ between $x$ and $x+r_n$. Therefore, $$ | \psi_n(x) - \phi'(x) | = | r_n^{-1} (\phi(x+r_n) - \phi(x)) - \phi'(x) | = | \phi'(\xi_n) - \phi'(x) | . $$
Now, the mean value theorem again says that $\phi'(\xi_n) - \phi'(x) = (\xi_n-x) \phi''(\eta_n)$ for some $\eta_n$ between $\xi_n$ and $x$. Thus, $$ | \psi_n(x) - \phi'(x) | \leq | \xi_n-x | |\phi''(\eta_n)| \leq | r_n | \sup_{y \in \mathbb{R}} |\phi''(y)| \to 0 \cdot \sup_{y \in \mathbb{R}} |\phi''(y)| = 0 \text{ as $n\to \infty$}, $$ since $\sup_{y \in \mathbb{R}} |\phi''(y)|$ is finite. This implies that $\| \psi_n - \phi' \| \to 0$ as $n \to \infty.$
This shows point 2 for $k=0.$ For $k=1,2,\ldots$ we just have to apply the same reasoning, replacing $\psi_n$ with $\partial^k \psi_n(x) = r_n^{-1}(\phi^{(k)}(x+r_n) - \phi^{(k)}(x))$ and $\phi'$ with $\partial^k \phi' = \phi^{(k+1)}$.