Suppose $f(x_{1}, x_{2})$ defined on a compact set, which guarantee the existence of extrema, $x_1*, x_2*$, and also given the Hessian matrix of $f$ is strictly concave. Suppose there is also a exogenous variable $t$, where $0<t<1$, is in the function $f(x_1,x_2)$, in order to find $\frac{\partial x_1*}{\partial t}$, can I take the derivative with respect to t over the equation of $\frac{\partial f(x_1*, x_2*)}{\partial x_1} = 0$(Assuming I can find it in this way) This equation holds due to the existence of extrema. The only problem I have is can I, actually taking the derivative with respect to exogenous variable? And because in order to find the Hessian matrix, I only consider the two variables $x_1$, $x_2$, so it's a 2 by 2 matrix, because I kind of assumed t to be fixed, therefore it's a constant? Then, what would it mean to take derivative with respect to a constant? Plus, I don't know if t and $x_1$ is dependent or not.
2026-03-30 21:08:30.1774904910
Derivative w.r.t exogenous variables
43 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CALCULUS
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- How can I prove that $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\ln(1+\cos(\alpha)\cos(x))}{\cos(x)}dx=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\pi^2}{4}-\alpha^2\right)$?
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- If $f ◦f$ is differentiable, then $f ◦f ◦f$ is differentiable
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Number of roots of the e
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- How to prove $\frac 10 \notin \mathbb R $
- Proving that: $||x|^{s/2}-|y|^{s/2}|\le 2|x-y|^{s/2}$
Related Questions in DERIVATIVES
- Derivative of $ \sqrt x + sinx $
- Second directional derivative of a scaler in polar coordinate
- A problem on mathematical analysis.
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Does there exist any relationship between non-constant $N$-Exhaustible function and differentiability?
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- How would I simplify this fraction easily?
- Why is the derivative of a vector in polar form the cross product?
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- Gradient and Hessian of quadratic form
Related Questions in ECONOMICS
- Total savings from monthly deposits
- Calculus problem from a book of economics.
- a risk lover agent behave as if risk natural.
- Changes in the mean absolute difference (relating to the Gini coefficient)
- Absurd differential in first order condition
- FM Actuary question, comparing interest rate and Discount rate
- How do I solve for the selling price?
- Stochastic Dynamic Programming: Deriving the Steady-State for a Lottery
- A loan is to be repaid quarterly for five years that will start at the end of two years. If interest rate is $6$%..
- A cash loan is to be repaid by paying $13500$ quarterly for three years starting at the end of four years. If the interest rate is $12$%
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If the solution $x^*(t)=(x_1^*(t),x_2^*(t))$ is interior at the initial value of $t$ (which is not guaranteed by your assumptions), then we can use the implicit function theorem.
Explicitly including $t$ as an argument in $f$, the solutions are defined by the following first-order conditions:
$$\text{$f_1(x^*_1(t),x^*_2(t),t)=0$ and $f_2(x^*_1(t),x^*_2(t),t)$=0}$$
Implicitly differentiating gives (suppressing the function arguments):
$$f_{11}x_1^{*\prime}+f_{12}x_2^{*\prime}+f_t=0$$
and
$$f_{21}x_1^{*\prime}+f_{22}x_2^{*\prime}+f_t=0$$
This is the system
$$\begin{pmatrix}f_{11} & f_{12} \\ f_{21} & f_{22} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}x_1^*(t)\\ x_2^*(t)\end{pmatrix}=-\begin{pmatrix}f_t\\ f_t\end{pmatrix}$$
The two-by-two matrix on the LHS is the Hessian. If the Hessian is negative definite, then it is invertible.
The solution is
$$\begin{pmatrix}x_1^*(t)\\ x_2^*(t)\end{pmatrix}=-\begin{pmatrix}f_{11} & f_{12} \\ f_{21} & f_{22} \end{pmatrix}^{-1}\begin{pmatrix}f_t\\ f_t\end{pmatrix}=\frac{1}{f_{11}f_{22}-f_{12}^2}\begin{pmatrix}f_t(f_{12}-f_{22})\\ f_t(f_{12}-f_{11})\end{pmatrix}$$