I'm trying to wrap my head around this article of Zhongmin Shenfor my Master thesis. In Proposition 8.2, he assures that in the Riemannian case in which $L(x,y)=g_{ij}(x)y^iy^j$, given the equality $$ L_{x^ky^l}y^k = 2L_{x^l}, $$ the following is true: $$\frac{\partial g_{il}}{\partial x^k}(x) + \frac{\partial g_{kl}}{\partial x^i}(x) = 2 \frac{\partial g_{ik}}{\partial x^l}(x). $$ I think the Euler theorem ($L_{y^i}y^i = 2L$) must be used somewhere to arrive to the result, but I'm very lost. Can you kindly give some guidance?
2026-02-23 06:25:22.1771827922
Derivatives of Finsler metric in the Riemannian case
40 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in INFORMATION-GEOMETRY
- Maximizing a mutual information w.r.t. (i.i.d.) variation of the channel.
- local geometry interpretation of binary hypothesis testing
- Find parameter transformation of probability distribution such that the transformed parameters are orthogonal
- $\alpha$ pythagorean theorem for $\alpha$ divergence in the probability simplex $S_n$
- Flatness of a statistical manifold with Fisher information metric
- Connections and applications of/between information (field) theory and information geometry
- What is the essential difference between classical and quantum information geometry?
- Is the quantum relative entropy a Bregman divergence?
- Exponential map on the Fisher manifold for exponential family distribution
- A basic question on mutually orthogonal coordinate systems
Related Questions in FINSLER-GEOMETRY
- Randers space and a Finsler space
- strongly convex normed space
- Isometric embedding of $\mathbb{E}^3$ into Finsler space
- Dual element of supporting function
- Geodesic on Finsler surface
- Geodesics and a general pregeodesic equation
- Reference request: Introduction to Finsler manifolds from the metric geometry point of view (possibly from the Busemann's approach)
- What is the difference/relation between Lorentzian and Finsler geometry?
- How to construct a Finsler metric on a product manifold and which are the short curves?
- Possible dual $(\alpha,\beta)$ metric on Finsler space?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Given that $L_{x^ky^l}y^k = 2L_{x^l}$. We have $$L(x,y)=g_{ij}(x)y^iy^j.$$ Differentiating w.r.t. $x^k$ we find that $$L_{x^k}=\frac{\partial g_{ij}}{\partial x^k}y^iy^j \text{, [$x,y$ are omitted for simplicity.]}$$ Differentiating w.r.t. $y^l$ we get $$L_{x^ky^l}=\frac{\partial g_{ij}}{\partial x^k} \frac{\partial y^i}{\partial y^l}y^j+\frac{\partial g_{ij}}{\partial x^k} \frac{\partial y^j}{\partial y^l}y^i$$ $$\implies L_{x^ky^l}y^k=\frac{\partial g_{ij}}{\partial x^k} \frac{\partial y^i}{\partial y^l}y^jy^k+\frac{\partial g_{ij}}{\partial x^k} \frac{\partial y^j}{\partial y^l}y^iy^k$$ $$\implies L_{x^ky^l}y^k=\frac{\partial g_{ij}}{\partial x^k} \delta^i_l y^jy^k+\frac{\partial g_{ij}}{\partial x^k} \delta^j_l y^iy^k,\text{ $\delta^i_j$ being Kronecker's delta}$$ $$\implies L_{x^ky^l}y^k=\frac{\partial g_{lj}}{\partial x^k} y^jy^k+\frac{\partial g_{il}}{\partial x^k} y^iy^k,\text{ $i=l$ on first term $j=l$ on second term}$$ Interchanging $j$ and $k$ in the first term and replacing $j$ by $i$ on that term we get $$L_{x^ky^l}y^k = \frac{\partial g_{kl}}{\partial x^i} + \frac{\partial g_{il}}{\partial x^k}.$$ In similar approach it can be shown that $$2L_{x^l} = 2 \frac{\partial g_{ik}}{\partial x^l}$$ by suitable change of dummy index.
Since $L_{x^ky^l}y^k = 2L_{x^l}$ holds so we have $\displaystyle \frac{\partial g_{il}}{\partial x^k} + \frac{\partial g_{kl}}{\partial x^i} = 2 \frac{\partial g_{ik}}{\partial x^l}$.
Hope it works!