By Matlab, I know that the eigenvalues of the matrix $B^{-1}A$ are 2.457, 0.542, and 1 (multiplicity 3) where $A$ and $B$ are defined as: \begin{equation} A= \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 2 & 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 2 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 2 \\ \end{pmatrix}, B= \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 2 \\ \end{pmatrix} \end{equation} Similarly, the eigenvalues of the matrix $B^{-1}A$ are 4.56, 0.43, and 1 (multiplicity 4) where $A$ and $B$ are defined as: \begin{equation} A= \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 1 & 1\\ 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 1\\ 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 2\\ \end{pmatrix}, B= \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 & 1\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 2\\ \end{pmatrix} \end{equation} In general, given $n$, the matrices are defined as follows: \begin{equation} A = \begin{pmatrix} I_{n-m_A} & 0 \\ 0 & I_{m_A} + J_{m_A} \\ \end{pmatrix}, B = \begin{pmatrix} I_{n-m_B} & 0 \\ 0 & I_{m_B} + J_{m_B} \\ \end{pmatrix}, \end{equation} where $m_A \ne m_B$ and they can be $1,...,n-1$ (so it can be that $m_A < m_B$). $J_m$ is a $m \times m$ matrix of ones. Is there any explanation to why the multiplicity of 1 as an eigenvalue is always $n-2$ where $n$ is the dimension of the matrices?
2026-04-07 16:13:39.1775578419
Determining multiplicity of 1 as an eigenvalue for a certain matrix
142 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in EIGENVALUES-EIGENVECTORS
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Stability of stationary point $O(0,0)$ when eigenvalues are zero
- Show that this matrix is positive definite
- Is $A$ satisfying ${A^2} = - I$ similar to $\left[ {\begin{smallmatrix} 0&I \\ { - I}&0 \end{smallmatrix}} \right]$?
- Determining a $4\times4$ matrix knowing $3$ of its $4$ eigenvectors and eigenvalues
- Question on designing a state observer for discrete time system
- Evaluating a cubic at a matrix only knowing only the eigenvalues
- Eigenvalues of $A=vv^T$
- A minimal eigenvalue inequality for Positive Definite Matrix
- Construct real matrix for given complex eigenvalues and given complex eigenvectors where algebraic multiplicity < geometric multiplicity
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Here's one.
Since $A$ and $B$ must always be invertible, the following conditions are equivalent:
$B^{-1}Ax=x$
$Ax = Bx$
$(A-B)x=0$
$x \in \ker(A-B)$
So the multiplicity of the eigenvalue $1$ of $B^{-1}A$ is equal to the dimension of $\ker(A-B)$.
Edit: As pointed out by Theo Bendit, it's worth showing that $B^{-1}A$ must be diagonalizable in order to rule out any issues of a discrepancy between algebraic and geometric multiplicity of the eigenvalue. One way to see that $B^{-1}A$ must be diagonalizable is to note that $A$ and $B$ are clearly symmetric and positive definite and then apply this result.
Let's now assume $m_A>m_B$; if the opposite is true, we can easily switch the roles of $A$ and $B$. If we examine $A-B$, we find that it has $n-m_A$ zero rows, followed by $m_A-m_B$ rows consisting of $n-m_A$ zeros and $m_A$ ones, followed by $m_B$ rows consisting of $n-m_A$ zeros, $m_A-m_B$ ones, and then $m_B$ zeros. Since $m_B$ and $m_A-m_B$ are both nonzero by assumption, $A-B$ has exactly two distinct nonzero rows, so has rank $2$; thus $\ker(A-B)$ has dimension $n-2$.