What is the difference between "Let x be a ..." and "Let x ... be arbitrary"?
Consider the following example:
- Let $R$ be an equivalence Relation on $A$. Then $\forall x, y\in A.\ [x]_R=[y]_R.$
- Let $R$ be an arbitrary equivalence Relation on $A$. Then $\forall x, y\in A.\ [x]_R=[y]_R.$
There is no difference. "Let x be an ... " implies that it's any/arbitrary.
"Let x be an arbitrary ... " just makes this implication more explicit.
But formally speaking, they mean the same.