What is the dimension of the moduli space of lines on a general quadric hypersurface in $\mathbb{P}^n$? Maybe the question is quite trivial, but different intuitive approaches (à la Italian algebraic geometry) yield different answers.
2026-03-26 13:30:17.1774531817
Dimension of moduli of lines on quadric
599 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Related Questions in INTERSECTION-THEORY
- Does an immersed curve in general position has finite self-intersections?
- Compute multiplicity by intersections
- Why is any finite set of points on a twisted cubic curve, in general position?
- General twisted cubics
- Degrees of Veronese varieties
- Analytic Grothendieck Riemann Roch
- Intersection products in Algebraic Geometry
- Intersection of curve and divisor on $\mathbb{P}^1 \times \mathbb{P}^2$
- How does 11 split in the ring $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt[3]{2}]$
- Show that $S^2$ is not diffeomorphic to the Torus.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I'm not sure what you mean when you say that different approaches give different answers. As Fredrik Meyer says, the answer is $2n-5$: here are a some different arguements that prove it.
By the way, note that all smooth quadrics are isomorphic, so you can weaken the condition "general" to "smooth".
Method 1 (prehistoric): First fix a point $p$ on the quadric. Any line through $p$ lies in the projective tangent space $\mathbf T_p Q$.The intersection $\mathbf T_p Q \cap Q$ is a cone over a smooth quadric $Q'$ of dimension $n-3$, so the lines on $Q$ through $p$ are in bijection with the points of $Q'$. Varying $p$, we get a space of dimension $(n-1)+(2n-3)=2n-4$. But we overcounted: for each line, there is a 1-parameter family of points $p$ for which it appears. So the correct count is $2n-4-1=2n-5$.
Method 2 (classical): The space of quadrics in $\mathbf P^n$ is $\mathbf P^N$ where $N={n+2 \choose 2}-1$. The space of lines in $\mathbf P^n$ is the Grassmannian $\mathbf G(1,n)$, which has dimension $2(n-1)$.
Now in the product $\mathbf G(1,n) \times \mathbf P^N$, consider the incidence correspondence $$ I := \left\{ (l,Q) \mid l \subset Q \right\}. $$
We will see below that $I$ is irreducible.
The second projection $\pi_2: I \rightarrow \mathbf P^N$ is surjective, because every quadric contains at least one line. So the general fibre of $\pi_2$ has dimension $\operatorname{dim} I - N$.
On the other hand, vanishing on a fixed line imposes 3 linear conditions on quadrics, so the first projection $\pi_1: I \rightarrow \mathbf G(1,n)$ has fibres which are projective spaces of dimension $N-3$. (In fact this shows that $I$ is a projective bundle over $\mathbf G(1,n)$, hence irreducible as claimed.) So $\operatorname{dim} I = 2(n-1)+N-3$.
Combining the last two paragraphs we see that the space of lines on a general quadric, hence any smooth quadric, has dimension $2(n-1)+N-3-N=2n-5$.
Method 3 (modern): Let $E$ be the tautologial rank-2 bundle on $\mathbf G(1,n)$. Then $V = \operatorname{Sym}^2 E^*$ is a bundle of rank 3, and $Q$ defines a section $\sigma$ of $V$ (fibrewise, by restricting $Q$ to each line.) The space of lines on $Q$ is then the zero-locus $Z(\sigma)$ of the section $\sigma$. Checking that a general such $\sigma$ intersects the zero-section transversely, we get that $Z(\sigma)$ has codimension equal to the rank of $V$, that is 3. So $Z(\sigma)$ has dimension $2(n-1)-3=2n-5$ again.
Comments: The first method seems historically plausible, but it isn't rigorous as written. Moreover, it seems special to quadrics (a singular hypersurface of higher degree need not be a cone); by contrast, the other two methods work for general hypersurfaces of any degree. (In this context general really is necessary, not just smooth.)
The second method is more or less complete, as long as you accept that incidence correspondences are projective varieties.
The third method is trickier (the claim about transverality has to be proved) but it has a big advantage: when the expected dimension $2n-d-3$ is zero, this method actually tells you how many points the zero-locus contains (by calculating the top Chern class of the bundle). You can use this to prove that a general cubic has 27 lines, or that a general quintic threefold has 2875 lines.
You can read the paper "Galois Groups of Enumerative Problems" by Joe Harris if you want to see how to tackle the transversality question. There is also the paper "Rational curves on smooth cubic hypersurfaces" by Coskun and Starr that shows how to extend results of this kind to all (not just general) smooth cubic hypersurfaces.