I'm currently in a Discrete Math course at my university (not a homework question) so I'm fairly new at proofs (only 1 week into the course). I'm a bit confused at the best approach to proving statements and furthermore, how to properly write them. I've split this question into cases because I'm not sure how to prove this in a simpler way. This is what I've done:
Proof: True. Assume $x \in \mathbb{ Z}$.
Case 1: Assume $x = 0$. Then $x^2-x = 0$ which satisfies $x^2-x \geq 0$
Case 2: Assume $x > 0$. Let $x = 2$. Then $x^2-x = 2$ which satisfies $x^2-x \geq 0$
Case 3: Assume $x < 0$. Let $x = -2$. Then $x^2-x = 6$ which satisfies $x^2-x \geq 0$
Would this be considered a sufficient proof?
EDIT:
Sorry, I do know there is another method of solving this as I saw the answer that the practice problem provided. They solved it by completing the square and arrived at this:
$x^2-x = (x- \frac{1}{2})^2- \frac{1}{4} \geq - \frac{1}{4}$
and that was all that was there. Now, I understand the math but not why it's sufficient enough to qualify as a proof. Because to me it's no different than the original statement $x^2-x \geq 0$.
Hint: $$x^2-x=x(x-1)$$ so $$x^2-x\geq 0$$ if $$x\geq 1$$ or $$x\le 0$$