The main feature in Finsler manifolds is that the metric is not neccesary given by an inner product in the tangent apaces to every point. Are there theorems that tell you exactly when the Finsler metric is actually given by a inner product in every tangent space?
2026-02-23 11:46:46.1771847206
Distintion between Finsler metrics
95 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in FINSLER-GEOMETRY
- Randers space and a Finsler space
- strongly convex normed space
- Isometric embedding of $\mathbb{E}^3$ into Finsler space
- Dual element of supporting function
- Geodesic on Finsler surface
- Geodesics and a general pregeodesic equation
- Reference request: Introduction to Finsler manifolds from the metric geometry point of view (possibly from the Busemann's approach)
- What is the difference/relation between Lorentzian and Finsler geometry?
- How to construct a Finsler metric on a product manifold and which are the short curves?
- Possible dual $(\alpha,\beta)$ metric on Finsler space?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Knowing that a Finsler metric is nothing other than a (continuously varying) norm on the tangent space $T_p M$ at each point $p \in M$, your question requires asking, for each $p$, how to tell when the given norm on $T_p M$ is induced by an inner product. This happens if and only if the given norm on $T_p M$ satisfies a condition known as the "parallelogram law", and there are several answers on this site explaining that connection, for instance here.
Then returning to the given Finsler metric on $M$, and assuming that the parallelogram law does indeed hold on $T_p M$ for each $p \in M$, there is still be some work to do in order to show that the resulting inner products vary continuously as $p$ varies. You can see at that link that there is an actual formula for the inner product $\langle u,v \rangle$, expressed as a certain (clearly continuous) function of the values of the norms $\|u\|$, $\|v\|$ and $\|u+v\|$, for given $u,v \in T_p M$. So that settles continuity issues.
So far this does not address further issues regarding whether the inner product varies smoothly. But I guess you could just require, in addition to the parallelogram law, that value of the Finsler norm $\|u\|$ should vary smoothly as a function of $u \in TM$.