I ham trying to understand a proof from a book I am reading. It says the proof follows directly from the prior theorem and I just can't see that.
Let $X$ be a random measure on a locally finite, seperable topological Room $E$.
Theorem: The distribution $P_X$ of a random measure X is defined by both the values of the Laplace-Transformation $L_X(f), f \in C^+_c(E)$ and the values of the characteristic function $\phi_X(f), f \in C_c(E)$ with $$L_X(f) = \mathbb{E}[exp(-\int f dX)]$$ $$\phi_X(f) = \mathbb{E}[exp(i\int f dX)]$$ Proof: This follows directly from the prior theorem and the Laplace-transformation/the characteristic function being unique.
I am sitting here for some while now and not seeing it. The prior theorem is:
The distribution $P_X$ of a random measure X is distinctly determined by the distribution of $$((I_{f_1}, .., I_{f_n}): n \in \mathbb{N}; f_1, ... ,f_n \in C_c^+(E))$$ as well as by the distribution of $$((I_{A_1}, ..., I_{A_n}): n \in \mathbb{N}; A_1, ..., A_n \in B_b(E), A_i \cap A_j = \emptyset \text{ for } i \neq j)$$
With
- $I_f(\mu) = \int f d\mu$
- $I_A(\mu) = \mu(A)$
- $B_b$ the relative compact borel sets (their closure is compact)
Any help, tips, whatsoever are highly appreciated!
Argue something like this: Suppose $\phi_X(f) = \phi_{X'}(f)$ for every $f$. Pick sets $A_1,\ldots,A_n$ in $B_b$ and constants $t_1,\ldots,t_n$ and put $f=\sum t_i \chi_{A_i}$, where $\chi_{A_i}$ is the indicator function of set $A_i$ (taking value $1$ on $A_i$ and $0$ elsewhere). By assumption, $$\mathbb{E}[\exp(i\int f\, dX)] = \mathbb{E}[\exp(i\int f\, dX')]\tag{*} $$ But $\int f\,dX=\int\sum t_i\chi_{A_i}\,dX = \sum t_i\int \chi_{A_i}\,dX=\sum t_i X(A_i)$. The equality (*) holds for all choices of $t_1,\ldots,t_n$, so by uniqueness of characteristic functions in $\mathbb R^n$, the collection $(X(A_1),\ldots,X(A_n))$ has the same joint distribution as the collection $(X'(A_1),\ldots,X'(A_n))$. Now apply the second half of the prior theorem.