It's well-known that compactness (every open cover has a finite subcover) and sequential compactness (every sequence has a convergent subsequence) coincide in metric spaces, and that neither one implies the other in general topological spaces.
Given that both imply countable compactness (every countable open cover has a finite subcover), it is natural to ask if the notions coincide in countable spaces, i.e., can we prove the following?
Let $X$ be a countable topological space. Then $X$ is compact if and only if $X$ is sequentially compact.
I'm particularly interested in this because countable spaces are rather prevalent on pi-base, and it would be good to auto-populate the sequential compactness property for them.
Here is a rather different approach to proving that a countable compact space $X$ is sequentially compact which I find enlightening. Let $(y_n)$ be a sequence in $X$ and for each $x\in X$, let $C_x$ be the set of nonprincipal ultrafilters on $\mathbb{N}$ with respect to which $(y_n)$ converges to $x$. Each $C_x$ is closed in $\beta\mathbb{N}\setminus\mathbb{N}$ (it is just the set of ultrafilters that contain $\{n:y_n\in U\}$ for each neighborhood of $U$ of $x$), and they cover all of $\beta\mathbb{N}\setminus\mathbb{N}$ since $X$ is compact. Since $X$ is countable, the Baire category theorem now implies that some $C_x$ must have nonempty interior in $\beta\mathbb{N}\setminus\mathbb{N}$. That means there is some infinite $A\subseteq\mathbb{N}$ such that $(y_n)$ converges to $x$ with respect to every ultrafilter that contains $A$, which just means that the subsequence $(y_n)_{n\in A}$ converges to $x$.
(If you unravel this proof, it is actually basically the same as the one in M W's answer! The framework given by spaces of ultrafilters makes it more intuitive to me, though. Maybe I am weird in that respect.)