I suspect the answer to the title question is "yes," but can it be proved? One would expect digits match in one tenth of cases.
2026-05-16 12:24:31.1778934271
Do the decimal digits of $\pi$ and $\sqrt{2}$ coincide infinitely often?
84 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in IRRATIONAL-NUMBERS
- Convergence of a rational sequence to a irrational limit
- $\alpha$ is an irrational number. Is $\liminf_{n\rightarrow\infty}n\{ n\alpha\}$ always positive?
- Is this : $\sqrt{3+\sqrt{2+\sqrt{3+\sqrt{2+\sqrt{\cdots}}}}}$ irrational number?
- ls $\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}$ the only sum of two irrational which close to $\pi$?
- Find an equation where all 'y' is always irrational for all integer values of x
- Is a irrational number still irrational when we apply some mapping to its decimal representation?
- Density of a real subset $A$ such that $\forall (a,b) \in A^2, \ \sqrt{ab} \in A$
- Proof of irrationality
- Is there an essential difference between Cartwright's and Niven's proofs of the irrationality of $\pi$?
- Where am I making a mistake in showing that countability isn't a thing?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
geometry
circles
algebraic-number-theory
functions
real-analysis
elementary-set-theory
proof-verification
proof-writing
number-theory
elementary-number-theory
puzzle
game-theory
calculus
multivariable-calculus
partial-derivative
complex-analysis
logic
set-theory
second-order-logic
homotopy-theory
winding-number
ordinary-differential-equations
numerical-methods
derivatives
integration
definite-integrals
probability
limits
sequences-and-series
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I'm sure your expectation is correct in reality; but as commenters have mentioned, this is the type of problem that is currently hopeless given what we know about proving such statements.
Just to point out how far away we seem to be from being able to address this problem, let me make the following provocative and surely false assertion:
After finitely many digits, the decimal expansion of $\pi$ consists only of $3$s and $8$s and the decimal expansion of $\sqrt2$ consists only of $1$s and $5$s.
That statement is ridiculous—but we can't even disprove that, as far as I'm aware! And the conjecture in the OP is far stronger than simply disproving the above provocative statement.