While playing with expressions, I came up to the following "infinite sums". I haven't seen them anywhere else but maybe I didn't look long enough. Find the values of $s$ and $t$. $$s=\sum\nolimits_{1}^{\sum\nolimits_{1}^{\sum\nolimits_{1}^{~\mathstrut^{.^{.^{.^{.^{}}}}}~}1}1}1$$ $$t=\int_{0}^{\int_{0}^{\int_{0}^{~\mathstrut^{.^{.^{.^{.^{}}}}}~} dx} dx} dx\\$$ Does this mean that notation is inadequate at representing values in a nonambiguous way or are these expressions just an example of notation abuse?
2026-04-24 22:26:39.1777069599
Do these infinite expressions have a meaning?
318 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
There are 2 best solutions below
Related Questions in SEQUENCES-AND-SERIES
- How to show that $k < m_1+2$?
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Negative Countdown
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Show that the sequence is bounded below 3
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Convergence of a rational sequence to a irrational limit
- studying the convergence of a series:
Related Questions in NOTATION
- Symbol for assignment of a truth-value?
- Does approximation usually exclude equality?
- Is division inherently the last operation when using fraction notation or is the order of operation always PEMDAS?
- Question about notation $S^c$
- strange partial integration
- What does Kx mean in this equation? [in Carnap or Russell and Whitehead's logical notation]
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- What does this "\" mathematics symbol mean?
- Why a set or vector start counting from a negative or zero index?
- How to express a sentence having two for all?
Related Questions in RECREATIONAL-MATHEMATICS
- Good ideas for communicating the joy of mathematics to nine and ten year olds
- Who has built the house of Mason?
- Is there any tri-angle ?
- In what position , the dogs will reside?
- existence of solutions of $a^n+b^n+c^n=6^n$
- Sushi Go! and optimal passing strategy
- Cut the letter $M$ to obtain $9$ single triangles by drawing $3$ straight lines
- Tennis balls problem from John H Conway's "Genius At Play"
- The Heegner Polynomials
- 2018 January Challenge: Prove inequality in geometry problem
Related Questions in PUZZLE
- Maximum number of guaranteed coins to get in a "30 coins in 3 boxes" puzzle
- Interesting number theoretical game
- Number of divisors 888,888.
- Who has built the house of Mason?
- Is there any tri-angle ?
- In what position , the dogs will reside?
- Number of ways to go from A to I
- Who is the truth teller (logic puzzle)
- How many solutions are there if you draw 14 Crosses in a 6x6 Grid?
- Symmetric latin square diagonal elements
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It is not entirely unambiguously clear to me what those expressions should mean. The dots suggest something of a limiting process, so I'd interpret them as limits.
The expression for $s$ can be viewed as a limit as follows: Define a sequence $s_0,s_1,\ldots$ as $$s_0:=1\qquad\text{ and }\qquad s_{n+1}:=\sum_{i=1}^{s_n}1\ \text{ for }\ n\geq0.$$ Then $s$ can be viewed as the limit of this sequence, i.e. $s=\lim_{n\to\infty}s_n$. But the expression for $s_{n+1}$ can be written as $$s_{n+1}=\sum_{i=1}^{s_n}1=s_n,$$ so we have $s_n=s_0=1$ for all $n$, and hence $s=\lim_{n\to\infty}=1$. Perhaps the choice of $s_0:=1$ was a bit arbitrary, but for any choice of $s_0$ we get $s=s_0$ by the same reasoning.
For $t$ an entirely analogous argument shows an entirely analogous result.
So I would say that these expressions, without further explanation, are notational abuse. It is not unambiguously clear what the dots should mean, and if there is a limit involved in the way I described here, it is not clear what the initial value should be. Moreover, the limit is equal to the initial value in these particular cases, so the notation also seems useless, apart from making a fun exercise.