Does a map that preserves lengths of rectifiable curves preserve lengths of all curves?

344 Views Asked by At

Let $X,Y$ be length spaces, and let $\, f:X \to Y$ be a map.

Suppose that $f$ preserves the lengths of all rectifiable curves in $X$, i.e for every (continuous) path $\alpha$ such that $L_X(\alpha) < \infty$, $L_Y(f \circ \alpha)=L_X(\alpha)$.

Question: Is it true that $f$ preserves lengths of all paths, rectifiable or not? i.e assume $L_X(\alpha) = \infty$. Is it true that $L_Y(f \circ \alpha)= \infty$?

In other words, does $f$ take non-rectifiable curves to non-rectifiable curves?

Does anything change if we assume $X,Y$ are Riemannian manifolds?


A naive approach would be as follows:

If $L_X(\alpha)=\infty$, then perhaps we can break $\alpha$ by restrictions $\alpha_n=\left.\alpha\right|_{I_n}$, such that $n \le L_X(\alpha_n) < \infty$, and so $L_Y(f \circ \alpha) \ge L_Y(f \circ \alpha_n)=L_X(\alpha_n) \ge n$. However, not every non-rectifiable curve can be broken in this way- think of the Koch's snowflake- every non-trivial restriction of it has an infinite length.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

13
On

On $M:=\mathbb{E}^3$, we have a metric $$ g =dx^2+dy^2+\omega^2,\ \omega=xdy-dz $$ Consider a projection $$\pi : (M,g) \rightarrow (\mathbb{E}^2,dx^2+dy^2),\ \pi (x,y,z)=(x,y)$$

Note that $$ d\pi \ V =(1,0),\ d\pi\ W=(0,1) $$

where $V=(1,0,0),\ W= (0,1,x)$ Since $V,\ W$ are orthonormal so $d\pi$ is isometry on $(V,W)$

i) Define a new metric on $M$ : If $c(t)$ is a curve in $M$ from $p$ to $q$ s.t. $g(X,c'(t))=0$, where $\{ V,W,X\}$ is orthonormal frame for $g$, then $$d(p,q)={\rm inf}_c\ {\rm length}_g\ c$$

ii) $d(p,q) <\infty$ Here if the distance is obtained by $c$, then ${\rm length}_d\ c= d(p,q)={\rm length}\ \pi\circ c$

iii) $c(t)=(0,0,t)$ Note that $d( c(t),c(t+\epsilon))=C\sqrt{\epsilon} $ for some $C$ So $c([0,1])$ has infinite length wrt $d$

[Updated]----

i) Define a new metric on $M$ :

If $c(t)$ is a piecewise smooth path in $M$ from $p$ to $q$ s.t. $c'(t)\in (V,W)$ (We call it admissible path) then $$d(p,q)={\rm inf}_c\ {\rm length}_g\ c$$ Here $d(\cdot,\cdot)$ is Carnot-Caratheodory distance which gives to $M$ structure of metric space Here $d$ is finite

ii) Every two pts can be connected by admissible path (cf Chow-Rashevsky Connectivity Theorem)

iii) $G=\mathbb{E}^3$ acts on $M$ transitively and isometrically :

$$ a=(x,y,z),\ a\cdot (x_1,y_1,z_1)=(x+x_1,y+y_1,z+z_1+xy_1) $$

Note that orthonormal vector fields $V,\ W$ are invariant under $G$-action Hence action is isometric

iv) Ball-Box Theorem : $$P_r^c\subset B^d_r((0,0,0)) \subset P_r^C $$

where $B^d_r(p)$ is $r$-ball at $p$ wrt $d$ and $P_r^c$ is $$ [-cr,cr]\times [-cr,cr]\times [-cr^2,cr^2]\subset \mathbb{E}^3$$

By $iii)$ we have $x_k:= (0,0,\frac{k}{n}),\ d(x_k,x_{k+1})=d(x_{k+1},x_{k+2})$ And Ball-Box theorem implies that $$ d(x_0,x_1)=\frac{C_1}{\sqrt{n}}$$ for some $C_1$ Hence $$ \infty \leftarrow \sum_{k=1}^n d(x_k,x_{k+1}) < {\rm length}\ c$$ where $c : [0,1]\rightarrow M,\ c(t)=(0,0,t) $

Hence we have $$0={\rm length}\ \pi\circ c\neq {\rm length}\ c =\infty$$

v) Note that by definition of $d$, smooth admissible path is minimal geodesic in a small neighborhood By EXE 5.4.7, in fact any two pt can be connected by smooth minimal geodesic

So since $d\pi$ is isometry $\pi$ preserves length of admissible path

vi) Assume that $c_n\rightarrow c$ in point wise, ${\rm length}\ c<\infty$ and $c_n$ is admissible path

Note that $$ {\rm length}\ c=\lim\ {\rm length}\ c_n= \lim\ {\rm length}\ \pi\circ c_n \geq {\rm length}\ \pi\circ c $$ since $\pi\circ c_n\rightarrow\pi\circ c$ in point wise

If last inequality is strict assume that $$c([a,b])\cap c_n([a,b]) =\{ c(a)=c_n(a), c(b)=c_n(b)\}$$ and $c_n=\alpha_1\cup \alpha_2$ where $\alpha_1|[a,t],\ \alpha_2 |[t,b]$ are smooth admissible Here we change $\alpha_i$ with a smooth minimal geodesic $\alpha_i'$ s.t. $$ \alpha_1(a)= \alpha_1'(a),\ \alpha_2(b)=\alpha_2'(b),\ \alpha_1'(t)=\alpha_2'(t)=c(t) $$

From this infinitely many process we obtain equality

[Riemannian Case]

(1) If $c: [0,1]\rightarrow M$ is a curve then define a curve $c_n$ to be a broken geodesic joining $\{ c(\frac{k}{n} )\}_{k=0}^n $. Hence $c$ is a pointwise limit of $c_n$.

(2) That is any curve $c$ is a limit of sequence of curves $c_n$ of finite lengths. If $f$ is a weak path isometry, then $f$ is short. Hence $f\circ c$ is a pointwise limit of $f\circ c_n$. Note that $${\rm length}\ c=\lim\ {\rm length}\ c_n=\lim\ {\rm length}\ f\circ c_n= {\rm length}\ f\circ c$$

0
On

I am filling some details in HK Lee's great answer.

We want to prove $\pi:(M,d) \to (\mathbb{E}^2,euc)$ preserves (finite) lentghs of paths.

Take an arbitrary path $c$ in $M$, s.t $L_d(c) < \infty$. We claim that $L_e(\pi \circ c)=L_d(c)$. By the isomteric nature of $\pi$ it is enough to show that $c$ is consistent with the distribution $V,W$ (i.e $\dot c(t) \in \operatorname{span}(V(c(t)),W(c(t)) $ ) and that $L_d(c)=L_g(c)$.

Lemma 1:

$L_d(c) < \infty \Rightarrow \dot c(t) \in \operatorname{span}(V(c(t)),W(c(t)) $.

Assuming the lemma, we proceed as follows:

$L_g \le L_d$, since both $d,d_g$ are intrinsic and $d_g \le d$ (since in $d$ we allow less paths) so $L_g=L_{d_g} \le L_d$.

The argument in the proof of proposition 2.3.12 in the book a course in metric geometry (Burago,Burago,Ivanov) shows that $L_{d_g} \ge L_d$.


Proof of lemma 1:

To complete...