I know that cardinality of the $2^{\mathbb{R}}$ is greater than cardinality of $\mathbb{R}$. Does the cardinality of the Borel $\sigma$-algebra equal the cardinality of the $\mathbb{R}$?
2026-03-26 08:04:35.1774512275
Does Borel $\sigma$-algebra cardinality equal cardinality of the continuum?
261 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SET-THEORY
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Proving the schema of separation from replacement
- Understanding the Axiom of Replacement
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- Minimal model over forcing iteration
- How can I prove that the collection of all (class-)function from a proper class A to a class B is empty?
- max of limit cardinals smaller than a successor cardinal bigger than $\aleph_\omega$
- Canonical choice of many elements not contained in a set
- Non-standard axioms + ZF and rest of math
Related Questions in DESCRIPTIVE-SET-THEORY
- Are compact groups acting on Polish spaces essentially Polish?
- For any countable ordinal $\alpha$, there is some closed set of reals whose Cantor-Bendixson rank is $\alpha$
- how to construct a rudimentary function $h$ used in the paper ''scales in $L(\mathbb{R})$''
- Under $MA+\neg CH$ there exists a $Q$-set.
- Separating closed sets in the bubble space. (a.k.a Moore plane a.ka. Niemytzki plane.)
- Precision on the Baire property
- Uniqueness in Baire property representation for compact Hausdorff spaces
- Can height of tree more than $\aleph_0$
- Example of a unit circle subset that is $F_{\sigma\delta}$ but not $F_\sigma$
- Finite approximations to transfinite sums of real numbers.
Related Questions in BOREL-SETS
- Prove an assertion for a measure $\mu$ with $\mu (A+h)=\mu (A)$
- $\sigma$-algebra generated by a subset of a set
- Are sets of point convergence of Borel functions Borel?
- Can anyone give me an example of a measurable subset of the interval [10,100], that is not a Borel set.
- If $A \subseteq \mathbb{R}$ satisfies $m^\ast(A) = 0$, then there exist $B, C ∈ \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})$ such that $A = B \setminus C$?
- Why is the sigma algebra generated by the set of all closed subsets a subset of the Borel sigma algebra on $\mathbb{R}$?
- Permutation of binary expansion on (0,1)
- Kernel of finitely additive function on $\mathbf{N}$ and Borel sets
- Induced Borel $\sigma$-algebra.
- Does set with Lebesgue-Mass nonzero have almost surely an open subset
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The standard proof of this argument uses that the Borel sets can be produced through a transfinite process of length $\omega_1$: start with the open sets, iterate the process of taking complements and countable unions. One argues inductively that there are $\mathfrak c$ sets at each stage, and since $\aleph_1$ is regular and less than or equal to $\mathfrak c$, the equality follows.
One may want a proof that avoids any mention of $\omega_1$. This is possible working with codes (so you count codes for Borel sets rather than the Borel sets themselves; the "codes" are a way of keeping track of how the Borel set came to be starting from basic open sets). I sketched an argument in another answer on this site, or you can see a recent paper with details along the same lines:
Note that all these arguments by necessity use some form of the axiom of choice (eiher by arguing that $\aleph_1\le\mathfrak c$, or that a quotient of $\mathbb R$ has at most the same size as $\mathbb R$), since it is consistent with the failure of choice that the reals are a countable union of countable sets and therefore all sets of reals are Borel.