Suppose we have a list of elements $v_1, v_2, \ldots, v_n$.
Then, as I've understood, setting $n=0$ above results in the empty list $v_1, v_2, \ldots, v_0$ of no elements (please correct me if I'm wrong ).
Now does every element of the empty list posses every property $P(x)$ ?
I know that $x \in \emptyset \Rightarrow P(x)$ is true for every $x$. However, a list is not set ?
As an example:
$v_1, v_2, \ldots v_n \in V$ is linearly independent if $c_1 v_1 + c_2 v_2 + \ldots + c_n v_n = 0 \Rightarrow c_i=0$.
Are $v_1, v_2, \ldots, v_0$ linearly independent then ?
I know this might be a "stupid" question, but I've been wondering ...
Your definition of linear independence can be written as $$\sum_{i=1}^n c_i v_i=0\implies c_i=0\text{ for all }i$$ There's almost no difference in considering $v_i$'s as a tuple or as a set (considering them as a tuple simplifies certain arguments).
It should be clear the empty tuple $()$ or the empty set $\varnothing$ of vectors satisfies the definition, as the empty sum is $0$ and all of the (empty set) of scalars are equal to $0$.
This is useful because then all vector spaces have a basis (the trivial vector space $\{0\}$ can only have empty bases).