Let's observe a natural isomorphism $\lambda$: $T_p \Bbb R^n \mapsto \Bbb R^n$. Then we have $\lambda(\dfrac{\partial }{\partial x_i})=e_i$. But when we write for $v \in T_p \Bbb R^n : v=v^i\dfrac{\partial }{\partial x_i}=v^ie_i$ although the equality is true only considering isomorphism $\lambda$. Why don't we write $\lambda(v)=v^ie_i$ instead? Is an isomorphism such a strong morphism, that the elements of different vector spaces are considered identical?
2026-04-07 14:15:33.1775571333
Does natural isomorphism imply direct identification?
90 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I have no idea what you're asking but your description of the isomorphism is somewhat misleading. It is true that the identification of $T_p{\mathbb{R}^n}$ and $\mathbb{R}^n$ is obtained by the map you write but it makes it look like there is some choice involved. I mean, why should we send $\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}$ to $e_i$ (the elements of the standard basis) and not to some other orthonormal (or completely arbitrary) basis $f_j$ of $\mathbb{R}^n$?
The issue is best understood for a slightly more abstract point of view. Let $V$ be a real finite dimensional vector space (and in particular, it doesn't come with a natural basis). We can think of $V$ as a smooth manifold in a natural way. Then for each $p \in V$ we have a natural isomorphism $T_p(V) \approx V$. This isomorphism is given by taking a vector $v \in V$ and letting $\alpha_v(t) := p + tv$ be the curve that "translates $v$ from the origin to p". The curve $\alpha_v$ is a smooth curve and $\alpha_v(0) = p$ so $\dot{\alpha_v}(0) \in T_p(V)$. The isomorphism $V \rightarrow T_pV$ is given by $v \mapsto \dot{\alpha_v}(0)$. Once descried in this way, we see that there is absolutely no choice involved in the isomorphisms. If we want, we can choose a basis $e_1, \dots, e_n$ of $V$, use it to define linear coordinates $x^1,\dots,x^n$ on $V$ (these coordinates correspond to the dual basis of $e_1,\dots,e_n)$ and then the isomorphism will send $e_i$ to $\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}|_{p}$ but it is defined independently of any coordinate system.